[ath9k-devel] AR9285 WiFi throughput.

2011-05-13 Thread Sucheta ROY
Hi, I am using AR9285AGN card under Linux platform. This card is plugged into a Linux PC, and is connected through WiFi to a Wireless-N router Netgear WNR2000 which is configured at 300Mbps.This router is again connected to a Windows PC through Ethernet LAN. When I launch iperf client at

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9285 WiFi throughput.

2011-05-13 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Sucheta ROY sucheta@st.com wrote: Hi, I am using AR9285AGN card under Linux platform. This card is plugged into a Linux PC, and is connected through WiFi to a Wireless-N router Netgear WNR2000 which is configured at 300Mbps.This router is again

[ath9k-devel] MCS16-MCS19 HGI.

2011-05-13 Thread Alex Hacker
I found that MCS rates 16-19 HGI not present in rate tables. Which cause of its absence? ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9285 WiFi throughput.

2011-05-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 13 May 2011 15:00, Sucheta ROY sucheta@st.com wrote: When I plug AR9285 in some other Linux PC and repeat the experiment I see the throughput at iperf client side (AR9285) is 300Mbps.But this time I used two aerials on AR9285. Is this a UDP test? iperf client will report the UDP

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9285 WiFi throughput.

2011-05-13 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 13 May 2011 15:00, Sucheta ROY sucheta@st.com wrote: When I plug AR9285 in some other Linux PC and repeat the experiment I see the throughput at iperf client side (AR9285) is 300Mbps.But this time I used two

Re: [ath9k-devel] MCS16-MCS19 HGI.

2011-05-13 Thread Mohammed Shafi
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Alex Hacker hac...@epn.ru wrote: I found that MCS rates 16-19 HGI not present in rate tables. Which cause of its absence? this is my theory, it may be wrong, all those rates in the rate table are marked as invalid and also they are HT20 rates. also not

Re: [ath9k-devel] MCS16-MCS19 HGI.

2011-05-13 Thread Alex Hacker
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 05:18:37PM +0530, Mohammed Shafi wrote: this is my theory, it may be wrong, all those rates in the rate table are marked as invalid and also they are HT20 rates. also not hardwares support HT20 SGI we have this check if (AR_SREV_9287_11_OR_LATER(ah) ||

Re: [ath9k-devel] MCS16-MCS19 HGI.

2011-05-13 Thread Alex Hacker
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:45:32PM +0600, Alex Hacker wrote: This table includes information about MCSs 16-23 SGI and 20-23 HGI but not MCSs 16-19 HGI this is true for HT20 and HT40. Oh sorry, SGI = normal (long) guard interval here. ___ ath9k-devel

[ath9k-devel] Channel State Information (CSI) ?

2011-05-13 Thread Lito Kriara
Hello, I was looking into Channel State Information (CSI) and I found this topic, http://www.mail-archive.com/ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org/msg03877.html . Is there any update on if CSI is currently supported by ath9k? And if yes how can we access it? Kind regards, Lito -- The University