On 2012-04-09 5:29 PM, Michael Leun wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:52:45 +0530
Mohammed Shafi shafi.wirel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Michael Leun
lkml20120...@newton.leun.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 12:25:49 +0200
Michael Leun lkml20120...@newton.leun.net wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:37:44AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
You guys need to fix the subject line (like this), and make sure that
the right people are cc'd. This is not a stable issue - stable
cannot revert stuff that hasn't been reverted upstream.
So
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:59:14PM -0400, Sergio Correia wrote:
Hello Greg,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2 release.
There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:59:14PM -0400, Sergio Correia wrote:
Hello Greg,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.3.2
On 12.04.2012, Sergio Correia wrote:
is there any chance for this one to be included in this review cycle?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg87999.html
Thanks for pointing this out! This patch fixes my network problems
which forced me to go back to a previous kernel.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2012-04-09 5:29 PM, Michael Leun wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:52:45 +0530
Seems obvious to me, that this line
if (sc-ps_idle (sc-ps_flags PS_WAIT_FOR_TX_ACK))
makes the real difference.
Please try this patch with
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:32:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:03:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu,
On 2012-04-12 5:35 PM, Michael Leun wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:58:34 +0300
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org
wrote:
On 2012-04-09 5:29 PM, Michael Leun wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:52:45 +0530
Seems
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12 April 2012 09:49, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
A revert is the same as a patch. It needs to be in Linus's tree before
I can add it to the stable releases.
Right, because otherwise people's
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
A revert is the same as a patch. It needs to be in Linus's tree before
I can add it to the stable releases.
Right, because otherwise people's systems would actually work.
There are rules for a damn good
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:43:33PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12 April 2012 09:49, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
A revert is the same as a patch. It needs to be in Linus's tree before
I
Hello,
Am 12.04.2012 02:29, schrieb Greg KH:
is there any chance for this one to be included in this review cycle?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg87999.html
Have you read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? Based on that, I
don't think it can, yet, right?
Hmm, after
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:57:53PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Hello,
Am 12.04.2012 02:29, schrieb Greg KH:
is there any chance for this one to be included in this review cycle?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg87999.html
Have you read
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
A revert is the same as a patch. It needs to be in Linus's tree before
I can add it to the stable releases.
Right,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
So just reverting it from stable, *WITHOUT LEARNING THE LESSON*, is
not a no-op at all, it's a sign of being a f*cking moron.
Btw, the revert is now in my tree (commit 011afa1ed8c4), and marked
for stable. So
15 matches
Mail list logo
