Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Joe Semler wrote: > > With a XB112 card (3x3) in HT40 mode, 5Ghz, TX throughput (TCP) can reach > > 290 Mbps. > > Sample iperf run: > > > > [ 3] 28.0-29.0 sec 34.1 MBytes 286 Mbits/sec > > [ 3] 29.0-30.0 sec 34.6 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec > > [ 3] 30.0-31.0 sec 34.8 MBytes 292 Mbits/sec >

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Josef Semler
2012/5/26 Sujith Manoharan > Joe Semler wrote: > > > With a XB112 card (3x3) in HT40 mode, 5Ghz, TX throughput (TCP) can > reach 290 Mbps. > > > Sample iperf run: > > > > > > [ 3] 28.0-29.0 sec 34.1 MBytes 286 Mbits/sec > > > [ 3] 29.0-30.0 sec 34.6 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec > > > [ 3] 30.0-3

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Josef Semler wrote: > OK, tnx Sujith, but that brings me to my next question acc. 2x2 or 3x3 on > OpenWRT-based devices like NanoStation M or AirBridge M. Up to now only 1x2 > or 1x3 was possible on this devices. Do we have changings there too? Hm, am not sure about these devices. But, the number

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-05-26 9:55 AM, Josef Semler wrote: > > > 2012/5/26 Sujith Manoharan > > > Joe Semler wrote: > > > With a XB112 card (3x3) in HT40 mode, 5Ghz, TX throughput (TCP) > can reach 290 Mbps. > > > Sample iperf run: > > > > > > [ 3] 28.

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Ben Greear
On 05/25/2012 08:24 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> We've been doing some tests using Atheros stations and various APs. The max >> throughput >> we've seen so far is about 237Mbps (received UDP payload on the stations). >> (Open-Air, AP about 5 feet away, 3x3 MIMO, HT40, 5Ghz,

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Ben Greear wrote: > We're using WPEA-127N. We have a dual-core Atom for one system, and > a quad-core i7 CPU (and two wifi NICs) in another system.. So far, the Atom > with > single NIC is benchmarking better in some tests. We were only using one of > the NICs in the i7 for testing, but maybe t

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Sujith Manoharan wrote: > I am using a DB120 as AP which has dual radio - AR9340/AR9300. The setup is > standard: > > STA --> AP ---> CONSOLE >wlan/OTA gig-ethernet > > > The AP runs an internal BSP/SDK build and is positioned about 4-5 feet from

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Joe Semler
Hi Felix, Am 26.05.2012 um 14:35 schrieb Felix Fietkau : >> >> >> OK, tnx Sujith, but that brings me to my next question acc. 2x2 or 3x3 >> on OpenWRT-based devices like NanoStation M or AirBridge M. >> Up to now only 1x2 or 1x3 was possible on this devices. Do we have >> changings there too?

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, If the device EEPROM states that it's a 2x2/3x3 device, it'll TX on two/three streams. If it's something like an AR9281 where it's physically a 1T2R stream device, that's what it'll transmit/receive on by default. If it's something like an AR9285 where it's physically a 1T1R stream device wi

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 25 May 2012 20:17, Ben Greear wrote: > We've been doing some tests using Atheros stations and various APs.  The max > throughput > we've seen so far is about 237Mbps (received UDP payload on the stations). > (Open-Air, AP about 5 feet away, 3x3 MIMO, HT40, 5Ghz, etc). > > We are still running l

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Christian Lamparter
On Saturday 26 May 2012 17:37:50 Ben Greear wrote: > We're using WPEA-127N. We have a dual-core Atom for one system, and > a quad-core i7 CPU (and two wifi NICs) in another system.. So far, > the Atom with single NIC is benchmarking better in some tests. We > were only using one of the NICs in t

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-05-26 7:15 PM, Joe Semler wrote: > Hi Felix, > > > Am 26.05.2012 um 14:35 schrieb Felix Fietkau : > >>> >>> >>> OK, tnx Sujith, but that brings me to my next question acc. 2x2 or 3x3 >>> on OpenWRT-based devices like NanoStation M or AirBridge M. >>> Up to now only 1x2 or 1x3 was possi

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 25 May 2012 20:17, Ben Greear wrote: > > We've been doing some tests using Atheros stations and various APs.  The max > > throughput > > we've seen so far is about 237Mbps (received UDP payload on the stations). > > (Open-Air, AP about 5 feet away, 3x3 MIMO, HT40, 5Ghz, et

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Odd. I get low numbers with a DB120 running OpenWRT (git HEAD). > > TCP TX - ~260 Mbps. > TCP RX - ~160 Mbps. > > UDP RX - ~240 Mbps. > UDP TX - iperf borks and doesn't display anything. > > The load seems to be a bit high (average: 1.92, 1.06, 0.61 ) and the > console

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Ben Greear
On 05/26/2012 07:09 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Sujith Manoharan wrote: >> Odd. I get low numbers with a DB120 running OpenWRT (git HEAD). >> >> TCP TX - ~260 Mbps. >> TCP RX - ~160 Mbps. >> >> UDP RX - ~240 Mbps. >> UDP TX - iperf borks and doesn't display anything. Maybe NAT won't let it throu

Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?

2012-05-26 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/26/2012 07:09 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > > Sujith Manoharan wrote: > >> Odd. I get low numbers with a DB120 running OpenWRT (git HEAD). > >> > >> TCP TX - ~260 Mbps. > >> TCP RX - ~160 Mbps. > >> > >> UDP RX - ~240 Mbps. > >> UDP TX - iperf borks and doesn't display any