Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add sta_update_rates callback

2012-08-08 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 03:11 +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > some drivers need to be notified in case of rates update. This callback tells > the driver that something has been changed in the supported rates set of the > station passed as argument and that it needs to update its internal tables >

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ath9k_htc: implement sta_update_rates callback

2012-08-08 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Antonio Quartulli wrote: > Since this driver internally stores the supported rate set for each station in > order to perform rate control, this callback is needed to update the internal > table as soon as the rate set changes in the mac80211 station configuration. This looks good to me. Sujith __

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ath9k_htc: implement sta_update_rates callback

2012-08-08 Thread Antonio Quartulli
Since this driver internally stores the supported rate set for each station in order to perform rate control, this callback is needed to update the internal table as soon as the rate set changes in the mac80211 station configuration. Reported-by: Guido Iribarren Tested-by: Guido Iribarren Signed

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add sta_update_rates callback

2012-08-08 Thread Antonio Quartulli
some drivers need to be notified in case of rates update. This callback tells the driver that something has been changed in the supported rates set of the station passed as argument and that it needs to update its internal tables Reported-by: Guido Iribarren Tested-by: Guido Iribarren Signed-off

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc 1mbps in IBSS mode

2012-08-08 Thread Antonio Quartulli
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Nicolás Echániz wrote: > > Sujith, does this mean that the problem is outside the scope of the > > ath9k_htc driver itself or could it be fixed? > > > > we are doing some heavy use of hardware based on this driver for many > > pro

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc 1mbps in IBSS mode

2012-08-08 Thread Antonio Quartulli
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:09:49AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote: > Nicolás Echániz wrote: > > Sujith, does this mean that the problem is outside the scope of the > > ath9k_htc driver itself or could it be fixed? > > > > we are doing some heavy use of hardware based on this driver for many > > pro