Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-07 Thread sandeep suresh
Hello Mr.Sujith, Thanks for your response. Based on your previous two mails, I understand the following; please correct me if I am wrong. 1. AR9287 supports a weight register for 2-wire Coexistence. 2. AR9287 does not support MCI based coexistence. Regards Sandeep. __

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-07 Thread sandeep suresh
Hello Mr.Adrian and Mr.Sujith, Thanks for your responses. In order to ensure that all of us are on the same page and referring to the same code base, some queries:   1. Please let me know you are referring to freebsd.org or linuxwireless.org drivers? Because you are referring to Kite & Kiwi w

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 April 2013 07:54, sandeep suresh wrote: > Hello Mr.Adrian and Mr.Sujith, > Thanks for your responses. In order to ensure that all of us are on the > same page and referring to the same code base, some queries: > > 1. Please let me know you are referring to freebsd.org or linuxwireless.org

[ath9k-devel] Increasing maximum number of stations in AP mode

2013-04-07 Thread Andrew Connell
Hi, I'm interested in modifying the firmware so as to increase the number of stations that can be connected when an ath9k device is in AP mode. Currently, after 7 devices are connected, whenever another device tries to connect, hostapd shows "Could not add STA to kernel driver". I understand this

Re: [ath9k-devel] Increasing maximum number of stations in AP mode

2013-04-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 7 April 2013 13:40, Andrew Connell wrote: > Hi, > I'm interested in modifying the firmware so as to increase the number of > stations that can be connected when an ath9k device is in AP mode. > Currently, after 7 devices are connected, whenever another device tries to > connect, hostapd shows

Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

2013-04-07 Thread sandeep suresh
Hello Mr.Adrian & Mr.Sujith, Started doing some experiments with different settings but there wasn't any good progress. Need your help further in analysis & recommendation, please. I monitor WLAN_ACTIVE (GPIO5) and BT_ACTIVE (GPIO6) on the oscilloscope. There were always a lot of pulse train