Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
I agree it's more of a workaround because there can be situations
where measured value is far from calibrated. In my setup it
helps but I haven't yet tested what happens in the noisy environment.
Do you know a better way to fix this? I am not so deep into calibration
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:25:17PM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
+ if (i2_p_q2_a0_d1 0x1000)
+ i2_p_q2_a0_d1 = -((0x1fff - i2_p_q2_a0_d1) + 1);
While the 'i2_p_q2_a0_d1 = (iq_res[2] 0xfff)' the condition
'i2_p_q2_a0_d1 0x1000' is always false.
Regards,
Alex.
Alex Hacker wrote:
While the 'i2_p_q2_a0_d1 = (iq_res[2] 0xfff)' the condition
'i2_p_q2_a0_d1 0x1000' is always false.
You are correct. I'll check with the systems engineers if something else
is missing. Thanks !
Sujith
___
ath9k-devel mailing list
