On 2016-06-17 15:48, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-06-17 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Felix Fietkau writes:
>>
>>> On 2016-06-17 11:09, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
This patch leaves the code for ath9k's internal per-node per-tid
queues in place and just modifies the driver
On 2016-06-17 15:41, Tim Shepard wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> > index 93b3793..caeae10 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h
>> > @@ -145,8 +145,
>> struct ath_atx_tid {
>> struct list_head list;
>> + struct sk_buff_head i_q;
> Do we really need a third queue here? Instead of adding yet another
> layer of queueing here, I think we should even get rid of buf_q.
Less queues, more filling!
>
> Channel context based queue handling c
On 2016-06-17 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Felix Fietkau writes:
>
>> On 2016-06-17 11:09, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> This patch leaves the code for ath9k's internal per-node per-tid
>>> queues in place and just modifies the driver to also pull from
>>> the new mac80211 intermedi
On 2016-06-17 11:09, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> This patch leaves the code for ath9k's internal per-node per-tid
> queues in place and just modifies the driver to also pull from
> the new mac80211 intermediate software queues, and implements
> the .wake_tx_queue method, which will cause mac802
The function ar9003_hw_apply_minccapwr_thresh takes as second parameter not
a pointer to the channel but a boolean value describing whether the channel
is 2.4GHz or not. This broke (according to the origin commit) the ETSI
regulatory compliance on 5GHz channels.
Fixes: 3533bf6b15a0 ("ath9k: Fix re
It is not directly related with ath9k, but with Intel 5300 NIC.
In https://github.com/dhalperi/linux-80211n-csitool-supplementary/issues/6,
dhalperi says:
> On 2.4 GHz bands, it appears that each antenna experiences an unknown
phase shift by a multiple of π/2 (or 90 degrees). This is probably wh
Dear Joe Ayers
Thanks for your response again.
I started studying and investigating on antennas theories.
Regards,
Jeon.
2016-06-14 14:19 GMT+09:00 Joe Ayers :
> This increased spacing looks to impact the detection angle before aliasing
> occurs with grating lobes. Google around, but looks li