Re: [ath9k-devel] [1/1,V3] ath9k: consider return code on

Eduardo Abinader wrote: > just to comply with current ath9k_hw_nvram_read to return value, hence > behaving reacting accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Abinader Thanks, 1 patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git:

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: Fix beacon configuration assertion failure

Kalle Valo writes: > Adi Ratiu wrote: >> commit cfda2d8e2314 ("ath9k: Fix beacon configuration for >> addition/removal of interfaces") reworked beacon configs to happen at >> IF changes and missed cases when NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION has no beacons >> with

Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: Fix beacon configuration assertion failure

Adi Ratiu wrote: > commit cfda2d8e2314 ("ath9k: Fix beacon configuration for > addition/removal of interfaces") reworked beacon configs to happen at > IF changes and missed cases when NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION has no beacons > with the corresponding values