[ath9k-devel] Max AMSDU info mismatching

2010-06-02 Thread oiioeu
AP configuration file: config wifi-device radio0 option type mac80211 option channel 161 option macaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx option hwmode 11na option htmode HT40- list ht_capab SHORT-GI-40 list ht_capab TX-STBC list h

Re: [ath9k-devel] oprofile the ath9k for low throughput rate and 3 questions

2010-05-25 Thread oiioeu
ar, please. -Original Message- From: Luis R. Rodriguez To: oiioeu Cc: Luis Rodriguez ; d ; ath9k-devel Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 11:51 pm Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] oprofile the ath9k for low throughput rate and 3 questions On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:24:01AM -0700, oii...@aol.com wrote:

Re: [ath9k-devel] minstrel_ht crashing kernel on IXP4xx platform during iperf throughput test

2010-04-19 Thread oiioeu
Yes, that basically solved this problem, there was no kernel crash anymore, thank you very much. since you had the same problem before, would mind telling me what is your throughput rate now? here I only have avg. 12Mbps, by iperf testing, AR9280( 11na ), HT40, IXP425, openwrt r20851

Re: [ath9k-devel] minstrel_ht crashing kernel on IXP4xx platform during iperf throughput test

2010-04-19 Thread oiioeu
YES, that basically solved the problem, I'm sorry being late, Thank you very much !!! However, I still got 12Mbps of the throughput rate by iperf testing with AR9280(11na) on the IXP425 platform, that's incredible, I used to have around 60Mbps throughput, what makes the big difference of th

[ath9k-devel] minstrel_ht crashing kernel on IXP4xx platform during iperf throughput test

2010-04-14 Thread oiioeu
maybe I should report to openwrt-devel list, but I think it is the problem of ath9k, caused by using the module minstrel_ht. the reason I try minstrel_ht is I could only get around 50Mbps throughput rate by using ath9k for my AR9280 card. some developer said the low throughput is a known probl

Re: [ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
sorry, I mean the station. I'm not sure where the problem is, I got an avg. 30Mbps( cpu load is <80%) throughput with my AP( cpu load is avg. 60% ) that built from OpenWrt latest trunk, and a 50Mbps( cpu load is 95% on the station ) with a Compex wp543 AP( cpu load is avg. 70%), while my AP

Re: [ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
if I did the iperf testing in the opposite direction, ( I used to set iperf client at PC2 and the server at PC1, not it's the client at PC1 and server at PC2 ) I got a avg. 55Mbps throughput rate, and maximum 60Mbps, it's still not alright for HT40, even for HT20. why the CPU load is almost

Re: [ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
Thank you. I did my test again with r19510 the latest one, and I got the avg. throughput like 45Mbps under HT40, the iw showed: r...@openwrt:/# iw wlan0 station dump Station 00:80:48:5f:6f:1e (on wlan0) inactive time: 190 ms rx bytes: 1234509163 rx packets: 115

[ath9k-devel] weird low throughput avg. 42Mbps && high CPU load as a SU

2010-02-03 Thread oiioeu
I use IXP425( CPU 533M, 64M RAM ) platform, OpenWrt r18530 with compat-wireless-2009-11-21. As an AP, it worked just good I could see an average throughput like 70~80Mbps under HT40( the throughput limited by the 100M ethernet in my test environment). As a SU, I tested with a compex wp543

[ath9k-devel] how to enable LED in ath9k

2010-01-18 Thread oiioeu
I found two places of code to control LED, 4 %a "build_dir/linux-ixp4xx_generic/compat-wireless-2009-11-21/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c" line 1013 2 %a "build_dir/linux-ixp4xx_generic/compat-wireless-2009-11-21/net/mac80211/led.c" line 47 for the first one I've tried to

Re: [ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-01-14 Thread oiioeu
since iperf testing costs a lot of the CPU resource on the router,here is my topology: PC_A <--> SU <--> AP <--> PC_B Iset up the ethernet connection between PC_A and SU, PC_B and the AP,there was wireless 11n connection between the SU and the AP, the APuses a bridge for wlan0 and eth0, the

Re: [ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-01-13 Thread oiioeu
Come on, what is an embedded system and what is an optimization? we might have something wrong with ourselves apparently. the driver wouldn't complain about is it a desktop or an embedded system. -Original Message- From: rootki...@yahoo.it To: oii...@aol.com Cc: ath9k-devel@li

Re: [ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-01-13 Thread oiioeu
my case is I only have 20Mbps of iperf test on 300Mbps/HT40, what could probably be the problem then? I already attached two pigtails for both the AP and STA. THANKS A LOT! AP && STA: OpenWrt 18xxx **

[ath9k-devel] what is the actual throughput we probably may have under 130Mbps/HT20, 300Mbps/HT40

2010-01-12 Thread oiioeu
suppose we have nothing wrong with the configuration, the driver, the hardware, regdomain, etc. and what might be the biggest reason to limit our throughput rate below the theoretic value? the CPU speed? Thank you! ___ ath9k-

[ath9k-devel] how to automatically select channel as an AP

2010-01-12 Thread oiioeu
madwifi will automatically select a channel as an AP being started, how to realize this? by any means, thanx! For example I'm doing with OpenWrt the latest trunk but seems hostapd is taking over this job and unfinished? or to modify /etc/config/wireless configuration file?