Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ath: logging message conversion

2010-12-07 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:05:28AM -0800, John W. Linville wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:12:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: ath_print is misleading as it's only used with CONFIG_ATH_DEBUG. Add and use the more normal subsystem_printk and subsystem_level printk equivalents. (ath_printk

Re: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ath: logging message conversion

2010-12-07 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 07:12:34PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: ath_print is misleading as it's only used with CONFIG_ATH_DEBUG. Add and use the more normal subsystem_printk and subsystem_level printk equivalents. (ath_printk and ath_level) Fix various defects in the current uses of ath_print

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ath: logging message conversion

2010-12-02 Thread Joe Perches
ath_print is misleading as it's only used with CONFIG_ATH_DEBUG. Add and use the more normal subsystem_printk and subsystem_level printk equivalents. (ath_printk and ath_level) Fix various defects in the current uses of ath_print formats and arguments: Unnecessary casts, missing newlines,