Bartosz Markowski bartosz.markow...@tieto.com writes:
Kalle, could you please submit/review these?
I will not commit any patches which have either RFC or RFT tag. And I
also review them in lower priority.
So if you want me to commit something I recommend to use only PATCH.
--
Kalle Valo
Michal, could you please address Kalle's comments.
From me ACK for the series (tested OK)
Bartosz
On 9 May 2013 12:33, Kalle Valo kv...@qca.qualcomm.com wrote:
Bartosz Markowski bartosz.markow...@tieto.com writes:
Kalle, could you please submit/review these?
I will not commit any patches
ACK
Kalle, could you please submit/review these?
Fixes quite serious problem.
Bartosz
On 6 May 2013 16:03, Michal Kazior michal.kaz...@tieto.com wrote:
FW is lying about tx status.
First two patches do a little cleanup. The last
one fixes beacon loss handling.
This can be considered a
FW is lying about tx status.
First two patches do a little cleanup. The last
one fixes beacon loss handling.
This can be considered a workaround depending on
what original FW design called for.
Michal Kazior (3):
ath10k: report mgmt tx retry status as no_ack
ath10k: cleanup tx completion
