Hi Matthias, The patch is working for me, and I am using it, but I could not test Much further since real-life radar situations are hard to produce.
Before DFS integration, combinations were less limited. I submitted the patch as a RFC only, because I suspected the DFS people had a hidden reason for limiting the combinations on radar channels. However I received no comments. Maybe I was on the wrong list. I will CC the ath9k maintainer now, and try to submit a patch in a week or two. Best regards Jean-Pierre > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Matthias May [mailto:matthias....@neratec.com] > Envoyé : mardi 15 septembre 2015 11:57 > À : Jean-Pierre TOSONI; linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org > Objet : Re: [RFC v2] [resend] ath9k: allow up to 8 access point vifs on > DFS channels > > On 09/06/15 18:26, Jean-Pierre TOSONI wrote: > > Allow the combination of 8 (AP + mesh) interfaces on radar channels > > > > Tested with hostapd, 2 and 8 BSSIDs, 1 or 2 DFS channels, BW 20 MHz > > TODO: test AP+mesh combination > > TODO: test 40 MHz BW > > --- > > This patch was done with quilt on Openwrt against compat-wireless > > 2014-11-04 > > > > Any feedback? > > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/init.c > > @@ -723,6 +723,14 @@ static const struct ieee80211_iface_limi > > BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) }, > > }; > > > > +static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit if_dfs_limits_mvap[] = { > > + { .max = 8, .types = > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MAC80211_MESH > > + BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT) | #endif > > + BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) }, > > +}; > > + > > static const struct ieee80211_iface_combination if_comb[] = { > > { > > .limits = if_limits, > > @@ -746,6 +754,16 @@ static const struct ieee80211_iface_comb > > .num_different_channels = 1, > > .beacon_int_infra_match = true, > > .radar_detect_widths = BIT(NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT) > > | > > + BIT(NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) | > > + BIT(NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_40), > > + }, > > + { > > + .limits = if_dfs_limits_mvap, > > + .n_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(if_dfs_limits_mvap), > > + .max_interfaces = 8, > > + .num_different_channels = 1, > > + .beacon_int_infra_match = true, > > + .radar_detect_widths = BIT(NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT) > > | > > BIT(NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20) | > > BIT(NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_40), > > } > Hi > This mail is in my list of "potentially interesting changes". > Do you plan to send this as patch at some point? > Or are you still testing something? > > Best regards > Matthias _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
