Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 07:48 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> > Ben Greear wrote:
> >> I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly
> >> sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor
> >> just can't keep up.
> >
> > I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'l
On 05/30/2012 07:48 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly
>> sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor
>> just can't keep up.
>
> I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'll try with it and see what numbe
Ben Greear wrote:
> I am not sure why there is such a big difference, but possibly
> sending wifi is harder than receiving it, and the Atom processor
> just can't keep up.
I have a small Atom-based netbook, I'll try with it and see what numbers
can be seen. It's a pain to pry it open and bolt a di
Ok, so thanks for all the suggestions and numbers that
folks have posted in the 'wifi throughput tests' thread.
Short answer: 352Mbps download, 270Mbps upload (not concurrent).
We set up two systems, both with WPEA-127N NICs (AR9380).
The Station machine is dual-core Atom, 3.3.7+ 32-bit kerne
