Al 07/01/11 09:49, En/na Adrian Chadd ha escrit:
> If you delve down deep enough to begin figuring out how things hold
> together in the driver, a few well-placed questions tends to be enough
> to get a set of very well-placed answers.
Then I must royally suck at formulating questions. At least t
On 7 January 2011 06:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> When there is working efficient communication then there is also
>> no point at all in leaking whatever is considered private. In other
>> projects there are NDAs between hardware companies and developers,
>> which allows the software to develo
On 01/06/2011 03:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 01/06/2011 03:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear
>>> wrote:
On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> so it takes time.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 03:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to
work wit
On 01/06/2011 03:14 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to
>>> work with engineers through our private internal list but since
>>
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to
>> work with engineers through our private internal list but since
>> ath9k is Actively maintained by Atheros engineers if y
On 01/06/2011 02:17 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> so it takes time. In the meantime we do enable active developers to
> work with engineers through our private internal list but since
> ath9k is Actively maintained by Atheros engineers if you have issues
> they should be clearly reported and Athe
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:33:34PM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Daniel Halperin wrote:
> > I think the level of support we have now from Atheros is better
> > than if they pulled entirely out of Linux and we only got support
> > via ndiswrapper and leaked datasheets.
>
> If only you knew what a jok
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 01:45:48PM -0800, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > It helps if the community acknowledges efforts and tries to work
> > with companies who are putting good effort on things.
>
> I would love to ack effort if I had experienced some. I've touched on
> a pleth
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> It helps if the community acknowledges efforts and tries to work
> with companies who are putting good effort on things.
I would love to ack effort if I had experienced some. I've touched on
a plethora of indications of significant issues in the driver a few
times volunt
Daniel Halperin wrote:
> I think the level of support we have now from Atheros is better
> than if they pulled entirely out of Linux and we only got support
> via ndiswrapper and leaked datasheets.
If only you knew what a joke your statement is to me.
I feel like an absolute fool for buying hardw
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Daniel Halperin
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Daniel Halperin wrote:
>> Give and take. Want sit on IP go ahead, people will route around to
>> find useful solutions.
>
> I'm really not going to start flaming with you, I'm just goi
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Daniel Halperin wrote:
>> > I found an interesting document I thought might prove helpful to
>> > anybody working on ath9k at a low level:
>>
>> Oh come on, don't be posting pirate Chinese stolen documents on here;
>
> Isn't that a matter to ta
Daniel Halperin wrote:
> > I found an interesting document I thought might prove helpful to
> > anybody working on ath9k at a low level:
>
> Oh come on, don't be posting pirate Chinese stolen documents on here;
Isn't that a matter to take up with whoever posted it in the first
place, rather than
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Galen wrote:
> I found an interesting document I thought might prove helpful to anybody
> working on ath9k at a low level:
Oh come on, don't be posting pirate Chinese stolen documents on here;
we're trying to NOT propagate the myth that all open source users are
I found an interesting document I thought might prove helpful to anybody
working on ath9k at a low level:
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/e0e678d184254b35eefd34ed.html
This is a very, very in-depth document that details everything from the
functional blocks of AR9280 to the registers. I do not belie
16 matches
Mail list logo
