Re: [ath9k-devel] OP_INVALID ... defines in the htc.h

2013-04-16 Thread Bill Wang
OK. I'll do that. Weisung -Original Message- From: Sujith Manoharan [mailto:suj...@msujith.org] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:10 AM To: billw...@magicpixel.com.tw Cc: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] OP_INVALID ... defines in the htc.h Bill Wang wrote: &g

Re: [ath9k-devel] OP_INVALID ... defines in the htc.h

2013-04-14 Thread Sujith Manoharan
Bill Wang wrote: > Seems that the defines below should be changed to bit numbers since > set_bit/test_bit take bit number as arguments. Makes sense. Can you please send a patch ? Sujith ___ ath9k-devel mailing list ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org https://li

[ath9k-devel] OP_INVALID ... defines in the htc.h

2013-04-12 Thread Bill Wang
Hi All, Seems that the defines below should be changed to bit numbers since set_bit/test_bit take bit number as arguments. #define OP_INVALID BIT(0) #define OP_SCANNING BIT(1) #define OP_ENABLE_BEACON BIT(2) #define OP_BT_PRIORITY_DETECTEDBIT(3) #define OP_BT_SCAN