Holger Schurig wrote:
> > Now two high powered, low noise Acess Points with a clear line of
> > sight would give some real range!
>
> HAMNET
And http://tier.cs.berkeley.edu/wiki/Wireless which changes the MAC
layer a bit, for very nice gain in performance.
//Peter
__
>In the USA Amateur radio operators can use 1000 Watts (under certain
> conditions) !!
Don't count on the 1000 W. Most countries have tight restrictions, only
allowing certain frequencies, bandwiths, max PEP, max ERP, max EIRP, max
electric field, max magnetic fields.
In Germany, with my li
Hi Benoit,
Yes. Having a patent is nice and probably significant too.
However, if using a preamp with a low noise figure results in
more signals or stronger (more error free) signals, then it IS
better than the chip itself !!
It is VERY surprising that no chips I am aware of provide di
RHS Linux User a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>The chip *FOR SURE* *CANNOT* measure the thermal noise level!! It isn't
> that sensitive. That said under some conditions it CAN measure the
> local interference level which IS useful.
>
In fact, that's what I thought first, but according to Athe
Hi All,
The chip *FOR SURE* *CANNOT* measure the thermal noise level!! It isn't
that sensitive. That said under some conditions it CAN measure the
local interference level which IS useful.
I am *VERY MUCH* in favor of making real time level measurements of
various parts of real packet
Hello,
In order to move forward with noise & signal reporting, I'd like to
share my current understanding of the way ath9k HW is working before
sending patches (unfortunately, I did the work before the introduction
of ar9003... so I need to redo the work).
The ultimate purpose of this work is
