2010/11/2 Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:55:22 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Ben, if you can easily trigger these problems on wireless-testing,
could you test with my patch and see if it helps? I'm especially
interested to see if it really fixes problem 1.
The only time I've been able
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot of monitor frame injection. The recent ath9k rx
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot of monitor frame injection. The recent ath9k rx locking
fixes have helped with stability in this use-case but there still
seems to be some tx/beacon related race condition(s). These manifests
themselves as
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot of monitor frame injection. The recent ath9k rx locking
fixes have helped with stability in this use-case but there still
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot of monitor frame injection. The recent ath9k rx
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot of monitor frame injection. The recent ath9k rx
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot of monitor frame injection. The recent ath9k rx
2010/11/1 Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se
wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that creates and destroys a lot of ap vifs and
does a lot
On 2010-11-01 5:44 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
2010/11/1 Björn Smedman bjorn.smed...@venatech.se:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:17:23 +0100, Björn Smedman
bjorn.smed...@venatech.se wrote:
Hi all,
I have an application that
2010/11/1 Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org
My TX PCU patches for ath9k are not merged yet, try those or wait
until John merges them.
They are merged in OpenWrt. Björn, which OpenWrt revision did you use in
your tests?
- Felix
I'm based on openwrt/tr...@23720 when I run code. But when I read
Björn Smedman wrote:
1. TX DMA hangs under simultaneous high RX and TX load
2. TX is completely hung but chip is never reset
I have also observed both of these behaviors with just a standard
hostapd single VIF configuration.
Thanx Ben, it's a relief to know I'm not the only one
12 matches
Mail list logo