Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-format

2005-03-14 Thread Robert Sayre
Julian Reschke wrote: OK, here are some preliminary comments based on what's available from : Julian, you "hacker"! You'll never get into Harvard Business School now. - the RNC grammar is still unusable in that TRANG rejects the

Re: Status of draft-ietf-atompub-format

2005-03-14 Thread Julian Reschke
Robert Sayre wrote: Graham wrote: On 6 Mar 2005, at 5:15 pm, Paul Hoffman wrote: Your assumption is completely wrong. The WG will review the next draft before passing on to the IETF. The timing of the IETF meeting is completely inconsequential. Can you fill us in on what's happening with the new

Re: Blogger Atom API

2005-03-14 Thread Arve Bersvendsen
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 06:53:54 -0800, Eric Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Atom docs are fresh off the grill: http://code.blogspot.com/archives/atom-docs.html One thing that bugs me: Since when does Atom use XML 1.1? -- Arve Bersvendsen http://virtuelvis.com/

Blogger Atom API

2005-03-14 Thread Danny Ayers
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 06:53:54 -0800, Eric Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Atom docs are fresh off the grill: > http://code.blogspot.com/archives/atom-docs.html That's marvellous, thanks Eric. First impressions are good - lots of verbs! Given that the spec is still in development (as the Atom