--On March 25, 2005 1:47:29 PM + Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are several RSS feeds out there that have dates where the day is
> accurate
> but the time is always the same (usually 10am for some reason), regardless of
> the time of publication, ...
> Proposal: Add to Date Con
Graham wrote:
1. Why are these two statements in the same paragraph?
The content of an atom:id element MUST be created in a way that
assures uniqueness; it is suggested that the atom:id element be
stored along with the associated resource.
Storage assures persistence but does nothing to im
Thanks everyone for all the pointers and thoughts on the subject. I can
see now that
the issue is not so easy.
I suppose I find the link method described by John quite attractive
concerning the
CC license.
Henry Story
On 25 Mar 2005, at 18:24, John Panzer wrote:
On a side note, since Atom feed
On 25 Mar 2005, at 17:36, Henry Story wrote:
given the following example xml,
...
http://bblfish.net/blog/page5.html#42";
type="text/html"
hreflang="en"
length="450"
title="The html entry"
rel="related/>
[snip]
So a better interp
/ "Thomas Broyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
|> | though I wonder why interlaced content models are used instead of |
|> "ordered" content models... that would also allow DTD or XML Schema |
|> (or any other schema requiring deterministic content models) to be |
|> used to validate Atom
On Mar 25, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
Atom already requires the timestamp to be precise to one second, but
it is not
practical to require (MUST) accuracy. We could do it, but we'd lock
out the 99%
of machines with bad clocks.
Plus, some publications just don't have an accurate ti
On Mar 25, 2005, at 18:38, Bob Wyman wrote:
http://bobwyman.pubsub.com/main/2005/03/lazyweb_query_a.html
The basic message is that we should not be writing anything that
implies that Creative Commons should be used for Digital Rights
Management.
+1
BTW, I think the anti-DRM clause of CC i
Henry Story wrote:
Clearly it would be very helpful if there were a machine readable way to
set copyright
policy on entries. Any thoughts on that?
This is not an appropriate time to discuss design changes. Please limit
list traffic to specific editorial suggestions and bug reports.
Robert Sayre
+1 on dropping the regex. It isn't from any of the other specs,
it isn't specifically called out as explanatory and non-normative,
and it is too long to be clear.
Some examples would be nice, along with some examples of things
which do not conform.
wunder
--On March 25, 2005 5:11:09 PM + Gr
John Panzer wrote:
> an example of an
obvious-to-the-practitioner-skilled-in-the-art indicator of a CC license for
Atom:
> "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"
/>
> which of course
also extends to whatever other license schemes someone might come up with, as
> long as they have
On Mar 25, 2005, at 14:41, Henry Story wrote:
Clearly it would be very helpful if there were a machine readable way
to set copyright
policy on entries. Any thoughts on that?
Legalese is complicated enough that it cannot be fully expressed in
machine readable form unless the machine is AI-complete
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:47:29 +, Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are several RSS feeds out there that have dates where the day is
> accurate but the time is always the same (usually 10am for some
> reason), regardless of the time of publication, which completely messes
> up sorting
On 25 Mar 2005, at 5:01 pm, Tim Bray wrote:
Could we make this a SHOULD?
Yes, I agree SHOULD is the appropriate RFC term.
Graham
1. Why are these two statements in the same paragraph?
The content of an atom:id element MUST be created in a way that
assures uniqueness; it is suggested that the atom:id element be
stored along with the associated resource.
Storage assures persistence but does nothing to improve uniquene
Bob Wyman wrote:
Henry Story wrote:
Yahoo! search launching a creative commons search engine ... it would be
very helpful if there were a machine readable way to set copyright
policy on entries.
..
So, in summary, let's not go down the DRM path. It is a snake pit
from
Sounds like a plan to me. +1.
Robert Sayre
Graham wrote:
Currently we have this
"A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the
date-time BNF rule in [RFC3339]. I.e., the content of this element
matches this regular expression:
[0-9]{8}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}(\.[0
Currently we have this
"A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the
date-time BNF rule in [RFC3339]. I.e., the content of this element
matches this regular expression:
[0-9]{8}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}(\.[0-9]+)
?(Z|[\+\-][0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2})
As a result
On Mar 25, 2005, at 5:47 AM, Graham wrote:
Proposal: Add to Date Construct section:
"Date values must have a granularity of one second"
Could we make this a SHOULD? Whereas Graham is correct in the normal
case, I have an alternate scenario at 'ongoing'. Normally, the
"updated" comes from the ti
I was trying to interpret the spec link element and found it a little
confusing.
If I try to look at the spec in a simple relational way (what is being
related to what?)
then, given the following example xml,
...
http://bblfish.net/blog/page5.html#42";
type="text/html"
Henry Story wrote:
> Yahoo! search launching a creative commons search engine ... it would be
> very helpful if there were a machine readable way to set copyright
> policy on entries.
I recently wrote on my blog about issues with Creative Commons. I
suggest you read the post. See:
There are several RSS feeds out there that have dates where the day is
accurate but the time is always the same (usually 10am for some
reason), regardless of the time of publication, which completely messes
up sorting the day's entries. Currently the Atom spec implies that this
is bad practice
well, we did something similar with p3p, metadata consisting of a a vocab,
either associated with a namespace element, or with an html method.
during the life of the drm wg i discussed the possibility of a similar
mechanism to express some drm metadata.
from my pov, p3p already expresses licensi
Hi, I just looked at Lawrence Lessig's presentation to the Library of
Congress [1],
and noticed his blog that shows Yahoo! search launching a creative
commons search
engine [2].
Clearly it would be very helpful if there were a machine readable way
to set copyright
policy on entries. Any thought
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:16:57 +, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I've updated my Atom to RDF/XML XSLT transform to implement draft-06.
Great stuff!
I've updated links etc. accordingly at:
http://semtext.org/atom/
Anything needs adding there, please let me know.
Cheers,
Dan
+1
looking good.
Note also:
3.2 Person Constructs
...
Person constructs MAY be extended by namespace-qualified element
children.
I'd suggest either striking this or (preferably) adding:
"See 6.4 Extension Elements".
Cheers,
Danny.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:44:17 -0500, Robert Sayre <[
25 matches
Mail list logo
