I've posted a draft of PaceSourceRecs [1]. It proposes that an
informative section should be added to give some recommendations on
how to use safely use atom:source without screwing up xml:lang and
xml:base.
I'm not sure where the Informative section should go? Should it go
inline, as a sub-sect
...only about subsets/supersets and duplicates...
Antone Roundy wrote:
@rel="subset-of"
@rel="superset"?
We've already got a way to handle aggregations from multiple sources.
Do we want to allow people to choose to just use a "secondary-to"
link to express that relationship rather than atom:sour
Sunday, April 17, 2005, 9:47:39 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> DTDs and namespaces are inherently incompatible. I think the
> restrictions the official DTDs place on namespace declarations should
> be ignored when embedding XHTML in Atom.
I strongly agree. Namespaces are a pretty fragile technology
On Apr 14, 2005, at 22:07, Robert Sayre wrote:
Bill de hÓra wrote:
If there is not a tidy way out of this, or we don't just agree to
scope it as a point solution for a particular flavour of XHTML, I
suggest we revisit the xhtml:div approach altogether.
Bill, I don't think the problem is exclusive t
