On 29/5/05 7:09 AM, "John Panzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>...
>>
>>
>>
> Or perhaps:
>
> ...
>
>
> :^)
>
>>
hmmm... seriously though, th
Henri Sivonen,
> A conforming xml-stylesheet processor will only act on the PI if it
> appears in the prolog. For this reason, it would be possible to allow
> xml-stylesheet PIs in atom:content and spec that they are part of the
> content document, so that an XML document with the PI in its pr
Aristotle,
> > (2) RSS and Atom documents are now processed with
> > PIs, and there is no way to formally specify
> > when those instructions should be executed (except for specific
> > instances that don't matter here). So any
> > nodes, and PI nodes in general, must be assumed to be linked t
Henri Sivonen,
> > MSIE conditional comments. See other person's reply.
>
> I thought they were for text/html tag soup only. Anyway, I think Atom
> should not try to enable such bogosity in XML.
I don't think Atom should take a position if it doesn't have to.
> > And yes: I know that Atom is