On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:28:35 +0200, Bob Wyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we can convince Google to work with the Atom Working Group on
starting an effort to define more compatible formats
Actually, Google Sitemaps is already compatible with the Google sitemap
service. From
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:29:34 +0200, Arve Bersvendsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, Google Sitemaps is already compatible with the Google sitemap
service.
err. Make that compatible with Atom
--
Arve
http://virtuelvis.com - http://userjs.org
Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
Actually, Google Sitemaps is already compatible with [Atom].
Yes, I've had a number of folk send me mail pointing to the FAQ that
I did not read as closely as I should. In fact, it is great that Google is
willing to accept Atom 0.3 files instead of just their
Bob Wyman wrote:
Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
Actually, Google Sitemaps is already compatible with [Atom].
Yes, I've had a number of folk send me mail pointing to the FAQ that
I did not read as closely as I should. In fact, it is great that Google is
willing to accept Atom 0.3
On 4/6/05 10:02 AM, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see how a highly specialized format for a particular task is
a competitor to or even compatible with what Atom does. There's
nothing in our charter that says we've failed if it isn't possible to
do everything conceivably related to
Graham wrote:
I don't see how a highly specialized format for a particular task is
a competitor to or even compatible with what Atom does.
The highly specialized task which is performed using the Sitemap
format is providing lists of changed web pages on sites. This is precisely
the
