Re: Feed History -02

2005-07-24 Thread Dave Pawson
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 09:14 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > Archives *should not* change. I think any librarian will agree with > > that. > > I very much agree that this is the ideal that should be striven for. > The underlying problem, I think, is that different feeds have > different s

Atom RDF/OWL models

2005-07-24 Thread Danny Ayers
Hi folks, I'm trying to collect a list of mappings Atom <-> RDF/OWL. Anyone that has such a thing, can you please drop me a pointer to the latest version(s) of any schemas, XSLT or whatever you might happen to have lying around. Notes on how current they are, or anything else of relevance appreci

Re: Atom RDF/OWL models

2005-07-24 Thread Ian Davis
On 24/07/2005 09:39, Danny Ayers wrote: I'm trying to collect a list of mappings Atom <-> RDF/OWL. Anyone that has such a thing, can you please drop me a pointer to the latest version(s) of any schemas, XSLT or whatever you might happen to have lying around. Notes on how current they are, or any

Re: Notes on the latest draft - xml:base

2005-07-24 Thread Bill de hÓra
James Cerra wrote: > I'd solve it in the same manner that XML namespaces solved the multiple > context > problem: by providing a default context as well as explicitly named contexts. > The default context works the same way as xml:base or the the default xmlns > works now. Explicit contexts wo