Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-06-26 Thread Robert Sayre
On 6/26/06, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/26/06, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your reading might differ from others'. I've read a lot of these, so I know this synopsis differs others. Usually they stuff like "WG is OK with this." It's perfectly natural to question

Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-06-26 Thread Robert Sayre
On 6/26/06, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Your reading might differ from others'. I've read a lot of these, so I know this synopsis differs others. Usually they stuff like "WG is OK with this." It's perfectly natural to question and appropriate things that seem out of the ordinary.

Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-06-26 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 8:35 PM -0400 6/26/06, Robert Sayre wrote: On 6/26/06, The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Working Group Summary This is not a WG draft. Nevertheless, the AtomPub WG discussion on this draft was fairly lengthy, and resulted in a number of changes to the draft. Who wrote this summary?

Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-06-26 Thread Robert Sayre
On 6/26/06, The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Working Group Summary This is not a WG draft. Nevertheless, the AtomPub WG discussion on this draft was fairly lengthy, and resulted in a number of changes to the draft. Who wrote this summary? Even Paul went on the record saying there was no

Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-06-26 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Atom Threading Extensions ' as a Proposed Standard This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact person is Lisa Dusseault. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05.txt]

2006-06-26 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
FYI... Original Message Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-saintandre-atompub-notify-05.txt Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:50:01 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

Re: [RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element

2006-06-26 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Nicolas Krebs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-27 00:15]: > Could an atom 1.0 feed contain some item whith > " somexmlns:href='http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/Technology/Coding/Java/' /> > and other item with > " somexmlns:href='http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/Technology/Sun/Java/' /> > where

[RFC 4287] unicity of atom:category element

2006-06-26 Thread Nicolas Krebs
Thanks for your previous answer. Excerpt quoted from section 4.2.2 of urn:ietf:rfc:4287 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287#section-4.2.2 ) > 4.2.2.1. The "term" Attribute > The "term" attribute is a string that identifies the category Is the term attribute an unique identifiers ? How ca