Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-07-18 Thread Lisa Dusseault
I can't speak for all of the IESG, how closely they reviewed the document and how carefully they considered the appropriateness of the namespace. We don't have rules against such namespace choices. We could argue about whether or not we should have such rules, but the results of that

Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

2006-07-18 Thread Robert Sayre
On 7/18/06, Lisa Dusseault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We don't have rules against such namespace choices. We could argue about whether or not we should have such rules, Well, there is a BCP about this. At this point, it's very rare to pull a document or change something like this that would