I think that has been understood; I believe that James will be addressing this namespace issue.Judy-On 11/9/06, Asbjørn Ulsberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 06:47:23 +0100, Judy Piper <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> I was expecting a Namespace document that explains the namespace URI>
James wrote:[snip]have it direct to a summary page like the XHTML[snip]+1 Judy-namespaceOn 11/9/06, James M Snell <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I've updated the purl registration so that it redirects to the RFC. I
can, alternatively, have it direct to a summary page like the XHTMLnamespace does if th
I've updated the purl registration so that it redirects to the RFC. I
can, alternatively, have it direct to a summary page like the XHTML
namespace does if that's what folks would prefer.
- James
Judy Piper wrote:
> I think that has been understood; I believe that James will be
> addressing thi
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 06:47:23 +0100, Judy Piper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I was expecting a Namespace document that explains the namespace URI
itself and the relationship between the spec and the URI. Am I wrong to
expect this behavior?
What is to be expected when resolving a namespace
On 8 Nov 2006, at 19:49, Jan Algermissen wrote:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Henry Story wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceSparqlLink
Are you really suggesting to use POST for querying (as the Pace says)?
Sorry, it was my misreading of SPARQL protocol to think that POST was
