On 17/12/06 1:13 PM, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Lisa Dusseault [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-12-16 02:15]:
Since clients post Atom entries and other clients retrieve
them, it seemed reasonable to want to extend Atom
client-to-client. If I used AtomFu client that was able to
annotate
Quite frankly it doesn't matter what we call anything right now. The
server gets to determine what pieces of data it's willing to handle.
Period. If you want anything more than that, use webdav.
- James
Eric Scheid wrote:
On 17/12/06 1:13 PM, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Lisa
James M Snell schrieb:
Quite frankly it doesn't matter what we call anything right now. The
server gets to determine what pieces of data it's willing to handle.
Period. If you want anything more than that, use webdav.
...
Again: WebDAV doesn't redefine PUT, so the situation is exactly the
On Dec 17, 2006, at 10:13 AM, James M Snell wrote:
Quite frankly it doesn't matter what we call anything right now. The
server gets to determine what pieces of data it's willing to handle.
Period. If you want anything more than that, use webdav.
(Sorry if this has already been said or
On 12/16/06, A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Extending the Atom envelope is a strategy of last resort.
+1
It is important to remember that not all processors of Atom data will know
what to do with unexpected metadata in the envelope. Thus, unexpected
envelope fields will often simply
Le 17 déc. 2006 à 11:24, Bob Wyman a écrit :
There is, I think a bit of tortured text in James Snell's otherwise
useful License ID[1].
1.3. Terminology bob wyman
[1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed-
license-10.txt
+1
--
Karl Dubost -
