On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 21:24 -0500, Bob Wyman wrote:
> I realize that this is a bit more wordy than the existing text,
> however, I think it better perserves the author's intent. Also, it has
> the nice attribute of limiting the discussion of "obligations" to the
> scope of rights granted by the l
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:53 -0700, James M Snell wrote:
> Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> > In any case, the draft says the referenced license only applies to feed
> > or entry metadata, not content. This strikes me as not particularly
> > useful and does not match analogous exten
