[atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

The RFC 4685 define an xml namespace with "http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0";. An HTTP GET http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0 answer HTTP/1.x 302 Found Location: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-12.txt which redirect to http://www.ietf.org/internet

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

Done! - James Nicolas Krebs wrote: > The RFC 4685 define an xml namespace with > "http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0";. > An HTTP GET http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0 answer > HTTP/1.x 302 Found > Location: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread-12.tx

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >Done! Thanks.

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

I was expecting a Namespace document that explains the namespace URI itself and the relationship between the spec and the URI.  Am I wrong to expect this behavior?Thanks,Judy- On 10/17/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done!- JamesNicolas Krebs wrote:> The RFC 4685 define an xml namespac

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

>Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:47:23 -0500 >From: "Judy Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace >CC: "Nicolas Krebs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, atom-syntax@i

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

Yup.  On 11/5/06, Nicolas Krebs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 00:47:23 -0500>From: "Judy Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>To: "James M Snell" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Subject: Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace>CC: &quo

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 06:47:23 +0100, Judy Piper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was expecting a Namespace document that explains the namespace URI itself and the relationship between the spec and the URI. Am I wrong to expect this behavior? What is to be expected when resolving a namespace

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

I've updated the purl registration so that it redirects to the RFC. I can, alternatively, have it direct to a summary page like the XHTML namespace does if that's what folks would prefer. - James Judy Piper wrote: > I think that has been understood; I believe that James will be > addressing thi

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

James wrote:[snip]have it direct to a summary page like the XHTML[snip]+1 Judy-namespaceOn 11/9/06, James M Snell < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I've updated the purl registration so that it redirects to the RFC.  I can, alternatively, have it direct to a summary page like the XHTMLnamespace does if th

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

I think that has been understood; I believe that James will be addressing this namespace issue.Judy-On 11/9/06, Asbjørn Ulsberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 06:47:23 +0100, Judy Piper < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> I was expecting a Namespace document that explains the namespace URI>

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

At 07:50 06/11/10, Asbj\x8F\xD3n Ulsberg wrote: >A good example is the XHTML namespace URI: > > Yes, this is a good example in general, but misses one important point. It should say explicitly that the namespace URI is http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml. Why? Because s

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:01:07 +0100, Martin Duerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A good example is the XHTML namespace URI: Yes, this is a good example in general, but misses one important point. It should say explicitly that the namespace URI is http://www.w3

Re: [atom-syntax] [RFC 4685] uri in xml namespace

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:08:34 +0100, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've updated the purl registration so that it redirects to the RFC. Great. I can, alternatively, have it direct to a summary page like the XHTML namespace does if that's what folks would prefer. Even better. +