Alternative to the date regex

2005-03-25 Thread Graham
Currently we have this A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the date-time BNF rule in [RFC3339]. I.e., the content of this element matches this regular expression: [0-9]{8}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}(\.[0-9]+) ?(Z|[\+\-][0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}) As a

Re: Alternative to the date regex

2005-03-25 Thread Robert Sayre
Sounds like a plan to me. +1. Robert Sayre Graham wrote: Currently we have this A Date construct is an element whose content MUST conform to the date-time BNF rule in [RFC3339]. I.e., the content of this element matches this regular expression:

Re: Alternative to the date regex

2005-03-25 Thread Walter Underwood
+1 on dropping the regex. It isn't from any of the other specs, it isn't specifically called out as explanatory and non-normative, and it is too long to be clear. Some examples would be nice, along with some examples of things which do not conform. wunder --On March 25, 2005 5:11:09 PM +