Monday, May 23, 2005, 9:20:07 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
> Hi,
> I will use the HTML version
> http://ietf.levkowetz.com/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?url=http://
> ietf.levkowetz.com/drafts/atompub/format/draft-ietf-atompub-
> format-08.txt
Only the text version is normative, but the editor pro
Le 05-05-23 à 16:54, Paul Hoffman a écrit :
]]] - http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-atompub-
format-08.txt
The latter, definitely. The former makes good guesses about
HTMLizing, but may have errors introduced by the automated guessing
process.
Thanks. :)
The bad thing with
Paul Hoffman wrote:
The latter, definitely. The former makes good guesses about HTMLizing,
but may have errors introduced by the automated guessing process.
You might have wanted to point to
http://atompub.org/2005/04/18/draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.html
--
Thomas Broyer
At 4:20 PM -0400 5/23/05, Karl Dubost wrote:
Hi,
I will use the HTML version
http://ietf.levkowetz.com/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?url=http://ietf.levkowetz.com/drafts/atompub/format/draft-ietf-atompub-format-08.txt
for something specific. Is it fine, or do people recommend another
HTML Ver
Hi,
I will use the HTML version
http://ietf.levkowetz.com/tools/rfcmarkup/rfcmarkup.cgi?url=http://
ietf.levkowetz.com/drafts/atompub/format/draft-ietf-atompub-
format-08.txt
for something specific. Is it fine, or do people recommend another
HTML Version of
[[[
Expires: October 20, 2005
