Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-15 Thread Robert Sayre
On 8/15/05, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suggest that the Introduction cover atom:source in the "recommended" > section and highlight the case in which it is recommended. Disagree. The introduction is for newbies. Folks implementing synthetic feed services (the case in which it is

RE: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-15 Thread Bob Wyman
The "Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format" indicates that atom:source is an "optional" element of atom:entry. While this is indicated by the "MAY" in the first sentence of the specification's description of atom:source, the second sentence, by using "

RE: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-03 Thread Hammond, Tony
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Ayers > Sent: 02 August 2005 14:09 > To: Sam Ruby > Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org > Subject: Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format > > > > Looks great. > > My only suggestion would be to expos

Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-02 Thread Danny Ayers
Looks great. My only suggestion would be to expose the MUSTs etc. little more, especially where Atom differees from RSS. E.g. right now it would be easy for someone coming from RSS 2.0 to think that was the same as . So in this case maybe: Identifies the feed in a universally unique and permane

Re: Oversights? (Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format)

2005-08-02 Thread Graham
On 2 Aug 2005, at 5:41 am, James Cerra wrote: http://example.com/ http://example.com/ Those are different ids ("Processors MUST compare atom:id elements on a character-by-character basis"), and the first is just plain invalid. Why on earth would you think otherwise? (oh, apparent

Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-01 Thread Eric Scheid
On 2/8/05 12:38 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/ > > Feedback welcome. " is patterned after html's link element. " [...] "rel indicates the link relationship type. " It would be good to indicate that atom:rel is different from html'

Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-01 Thread Roger B.
Sam: I've only given it a quick skim, but at first blush, I think it looks great. -- Roger Benningfield On 8/1/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/ > > Feedback welcome. > > - Sam Ruby

Oversights? (Re: Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format)

2005-08-01 Thread James Cerra
> Sam Ruby annoyed us with: > > http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/ > > Feedback welcome. Interesting examples. I'm probably missing a few things, so any clarifications filling the gaps in my head would be appreciated! :-) >From the Atom spec that I scanned (10) it is unclear

Introduction to The Atom Syndication Format

2005-08-01 Thread Sam Ruby
http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/ Feedback welcome. - Sam Ruby