On Jan 31, 2005, at 03:11, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:06:23 +0200, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So how many European sites besides the EU have the resources to
provide translations of the *same* content in multiple languages at
the same time?
The company I work in
Robert Sayre wrote:
I made that mistake because the draft in front of me is organized quite
differently than the one in front of you.
It was unclear to me as well.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Robert Sayre wrote:
So I can not include MathML in the TITLE of my weblog? I do not see
why this restriction is necessary.
Nope. Can any aggregator display it? I wonder if Shrook users are
filling Graham's inbox with requests for MathML in their titles.
Addressed in a separate thread.
In Europe
On Jan 30, 2005, at 19:06, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
In Europe there are lots of different languages. It does not make
sense to provide a feed based on language negotiation since feed
aggregators do not support that.
So how many European sites besides the EU have the resources to provide
--On January 30, 2005 10:06:23 PM +0200 Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how many European sites besides the EU have the resources to provide
translations of the *same* content in multiple languages at the same time?
Pretty common in Quebec. We see English and Spanish in the US from
On 30 Jan 2005, at 8:06 pm, Henri Sivonen wrote:
So how many European sites besides the EU have the resources to
provide translations of the *same* content in multiple languages at
the same time? How many of those can't provide multiple feed links and
really want to stuff everything in a single
On Jan 27, 2005, at 22:39, Robert Sayre wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
So I can not include MathML in the TITLE of my weblog? I do not see
why this restriction is necessary.
Nope. Can any aggregator display it?
I expect Gecko-based aggregators to support MathML eventually. After
all, once you
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Jan 27, 2005, at 22:39, Robert Sayre wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
So I can not include MathML in the TITLE of my weblog? I do not see
why this restriction is necessary.
Nope. Can any aggregator display it?
I expect Gecko-based aggregators to support MathML eventually.
At 13:01 05/01/26, Eric Scheid wrote:
It's only clear what's going on when the reader juxtaposes the two sections,
and realises that the concept named 'type' in section [3.1.1] is not the
same concept named 'type' in section [3.5.2]. Without that juxtaposition,
the reader might well never realise
Robert Sayre wrote:
* 3.5.1 rel Attribute
Why are the only values defined alternate and related? I have
implemented via for a long time on my personal weblog and some
aggregators have even implemented support for it. I consider it to be
quite useful.
Write a Pace. I would support it.
Yes, please.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:59:08 +0100, Anne van Kesteren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was about it. I hope it is of some use.
I share all your concerns and issues and hope they will be addressed
properly before the format is finalized.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-
On 26/1/05 2:49 PM, Robert Sayre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[3.1.1 says TYPE is one thing]
[3.5.2 says TYPE is the opposite]
Ah, you're right. Still don't see how it's vague, though.
It's only clear what's going on when the reader juxtaposes the two sections,
and realises that the concept
Eric Scheid wrote:
Ah, you're right. Still don't see how it's vague, though.
It's only clear what's going on when the reader juxtaposes the two sections,
and realises that the concept named 'type' in section [3.1.1] is not the
same concept named 'type' in section [3.5.2]. Without that
13 matches
Mail list logo
