James M Snell wrote:
/in-reply-to provides the atom:id (not dereferencable) of an
original atom:entry and may appear within atom:feed or
atom:entry. in-reply-to on the feed level indicates that all
of the entries within the feed are considered replies to the
identified atom:entry.
Is it
Thomas Broyer wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
/in-reply-to provides the atom:id (not dereferencable) of an
original atom:entry and may appear within atom:feed or
atom:entry. in-reply-to on the feed level indicates that all
of the entries within the feed are considered replies to the
identified
I've been continuing to tweak the comments extension and believe that I
am nearing a stable enough version to draft up the I-D. Here's what
I've got currently:
http://www.snellspace.com/wp/?p=194
There are three link relations:
* http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0/comments
*
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 23:15]:
Feedback requested.
I like it so far; comments follow (no pun intended).
/root provides the URL (dereferencable) to the Atom feed that
contains the original entries and may appear within atom:feed
and/or atom:entry
Why is this
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-21 23:15]:
Feedback requested.
I like it so far; comments follow (no pun intended).
;-)
/root provides the URL (dereferencable) to the Atom feed that
contains the original entries and may appear within atom:feed
* James M Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-22 01:25]:
For instance, if I linked to anything but an Atom feed, what
would in-reply-to link to?
Still atom:id values. Presumably, any resource linked to is
associated, by whatever means, to the Atom feed containing the
entry being replied to. I don’t
