On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:45:56 -0800, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2005, at 6:25 AM, Graham wrote:
>
> > I suggest we set up a panel to assess new extensions. They will
> > solicit bids from all the major vendors for threading, video, audio
> > etc and the best in each category w
Bill de hÓra wrote:
Danny Ayers wrote:
Try asking again in a year or so's time, when we have an audio
extension defined by Microsoft for Microsoft applications, a threading
extension defined by Google for Google applications and a video
extension defined by Yahoo for Yahoo applications. Case-by-cas
On Mar 5, 2005, at 6:25 AM, Graham wrote:
I suggest we set up a panel to assess new extensions. They will
solicit bids from all the major vendors for threading, video, audio
etc and the best in each category will be chosen. If a vendor chooses
to use there own extension over the one we choose fo
Robert Sayre wrote:
Bill de hÓra wrote:
Danny Ayers wrote:
Try asking again in a year or so's time, when we have an audio
extension defined by Microsoft for Microsoft applications, a threading
extension defined by Google for Google applications and a video
extension defined by Yahoo for Yahoo appli
On 4 Mar 2005, at 11:21 pm, Danny Ayers wrote:
Try asking again in a year or so's time, when we have an audio
extension defined by Microsoft for Microsoft applications, a threading
extension defined by Google for Google applications and a video
extension defined by Yahoo for Yahoo applications. Cas
Danny Ayers wrote:
Try asking again in a year or so's time, when we have an audio
extension defined by Microsoft for Microsoft applications, a threading
extension defined by Google for Google applications and a video
extension defined by Yahoo for Yahoo applications. Case-by-case will
favour those
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:12:23 +, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> One of the reasons for proposing PaceExtensionConstruct [1] was to allow
> existing RSS extensions and RDF properties to be used in Atom.
>
> If we have no model for extension elements, other than that they are b
One of the reasons for proposing PaceExtensionConstruct [1] was to allow
existing RSS extensions and RDF properties to be used in Atom.
If we have no model for extension elements, other than that they are bits of
opaque infoset hanging in specific but meaningless places, then it seems that
