On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:01:38 +0100, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On the contrary, I have a problem with preventing multiple revisions
from having the same atom:updated value. It subverts the intent of
atom:updated being a subjective element, and it puts the feed compiler
in an imp
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:13:35 +0530, Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 2 Feb 2006, at 02:09, Danny Ayers wrote:
On 2/1/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-01 17:10]:
On the contrary, I have a problem with preventing multiple
On 2 Feb 2006, at 02:09, Danny Ayers wrote:
On 2/1/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-01 17:10]:
On the contrary, I have a problem with preventing multiple
revisions from having the same atom:updated value.
But then you have no idea wh
On 2/1/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-01 17:10]:
> >On the contrary, I have a problem with preventing multiple
> >revisions from having the same atom:updated value.
>
> But then you have no idea which revision will be picked by
> clients
* David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-01 17:10]:
>On the contrary, I have a problem with preventing multiple
>revisions from having the same atom:updated value.
But then you have no idea which revision will be picked by
clients that try to show the latest one, which to me sounds like
it ful
[on atom-syntax only, no need to CC atom-protocol]
2006/2/1, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 3:20:23 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> >
> > IIRC, it was to allow a feed listing "revisions" of the same entry:
> > same id, different "updated" values.
>
> I don't have a
Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 3:20:23 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> [CC'ing atom-syntax]
> 2006/2/1, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 6:21:12 AM, James M Snell wrote:
>>
>> > Entries in an Atom feed can share the same atom:id but their
>> > atom:updated values sh
[CC'ing atom-syntax]
2006/2/1, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Wednesday, February 1, 2006, 6:21:12 AM, James M Snell wrote:
>
> > Entries in an Atom feed can share the same atom:id but their
> > atom:updated values should be different.
>
> To be precise, it is "Entries in an Atom Feed Docu
