Tim Bray wrote:
-1
I think this issue has been discussed to death and the current
consensus around atom:id and atom:updated will meet users' needs
simply and elegantly. Trying to achieve consensus on a generalized
abstract model of versioning is doomed to failure. -Tim
-1 as well.
Robert
-1
I think this issue has been discussed to death and the current
consensus around atom:id and atom:updated will meet users' needs simply
and elegantly. Trying to achieve consensus on a generalized abstract
model of versioning is doomed to failure. -Tim
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMinimalEntryVersioning
Multiple instances or versions of the same entry MAY appear in a feed,
index, or archive.
I'm in favor of this--it's easy enough to imagine uses for it (like a
feed showing the history of a particular entry).
Consumers MAY choose
