> PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
+1
/ Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| +1
|
| Welcome to the club :)
+1. I'll join. :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | A man may by custom fortify himself
http://nwals
+1
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:24:06 -0800, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Welcome to the club :)
>
>
> On Feb 2, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:
>
> >
> > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
> >
+1
Welcome to the club :)
On Feb 2, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
Proposal
---
Remove atom:info and atom:host from The Atom Syndication Format.
Remove atom:host
---
No one seems to like the
On Feb 2, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
+1 -Tim
Robert Sayre wrote:
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
Proposal
---
Remove atom:info and atom:host from The Atom Syndication Format.
Remove atom:host
---
No one seems to like the atom:host element. It doesn't do what its
original propo
+1
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 13:29:23 -0500, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
>
> Proposal
> ---
> Remove atom:info and atom:host from The Atom Syndication Format.
>
> Remove atom:h
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveInfoAndHost
Proposal
---
Remove atom:info and atom:host from The Atom Syndication Format.
Remove atom:host
---
No one seems to like the atom:host element. It doesn't do what its
original proponents wanted and ma
