Thursday, May 5, 2005, 11:42:22 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
-1
Irrespective of whether I agree with this or not, I think the material
belongs in an implementor's guide, not the specification. -Tim
I'm a bit uncomfortable with punting yet another issue into the
Implementor's Guide when the WG has
Looks good, but perhaps the recommendations could be slightly
different: Start by calculating the the language of the atom:feed and
the atom:entry. Second, if the language of atom:entry isn't the same
as the aggregate feed, set it. Third, if the language of atom:feed
isn't the same as the
