Robert Sayre wrote:
Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
that all
of the examples given in the document are valid according to the
schema?
Oh, you said *all*. The document fragments haven't been automatically
checked, and I just spotted one mistake. The link element in 4.2.9.2 is
broken.
I'm not sure what
software
package.
I saw your follow-up; thanks.
-Scott-
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sayre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:05 PM
To: Scott Hollenbeck
Cc: atom-syntax@imc.org
Subject: RNG and examples (was: AD Review Comments and
Questions: draft-ietf
Robert Sayre wrote:
Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
Thanks, but you didn't answer all of my question. Has someone (you?)
confirmed that the schema and examples are consistent?
OK, I'm probably not the best person to check the examples. Volunteers?
Me. Will be back to you in 24h.
cheers
Bill
