Well.
Could the IESG then please answer the following simple question...?
"If HTTP/1.1 (as defined in RFC2616) would be submitted today for
publication as Proposed Standard, would it be accepted?"
If no, shouldn't the IESG revoke the current status of "Draft Standard",
and declare it as "h
This is the IESG response to the appeal by Robert Sayre
posted at
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-from-robert-sayre-08-29-2006.txt.
The IESG has considered Mr. Sayre's concerns and believes that by
requiring mandatory to implement security mechanisms the IESG is
continuing a long establis
