Really? I'd no idea anyone was working on PICS, or had since ... I started
on P3P, circa 1999.
Add me please to your mildly-interested list.
TiA,
Eric
* Danny Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-09 14:38+0100]
>
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:42:23 -0500, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tim Bray wrote:
> > > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt
> > > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to.
> >
* Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-09 01:42-0500]
>
> Tim Bray wrote:
> > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt
> > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to.
> There are other bits of RSS2 that should be seriously considered --
> even if they aren
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:42:23 -0500, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tim Bray wrote:
> > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt
> > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to.
> There are other bits of RSS2 that should be seriously considered --
>
Tim Bray wrote:
> 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt
> image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to.
There are other bits of RSS2 that should be seriously considered --
even if they aren't widely used. For instance, the RSS2 element
which contains a PI