Re: The Atom Format end-game (PICS)??

2005-01-09 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
Really? I'd no idea anyone was working on PICS, or had since ... I started on P3P, circa 1999. Add me please to your mildly-interested list. TiA, Eric

Re: The Atom Format end-game (PICS)??

2005-01-09 Thread Dan Brickley
* Danny Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-09 14:38+0100] > > On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:42:23 -0500, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Tim Bray wrote: > > > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt > > > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to. > >

Re: The Atom Format end-game (PICS)??

2005-01-09 Thread Dan Brickley
* Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-09 01:42-0500] > > Tim Bray wrote: > > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt > > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to. > There are other bits of RSS2 that should be seriously considered -- > even if they aren

Re: The Atom Format end-game (PICS)??

2005-01-09 Thread Danny Ayers
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 01:42:23 -0500, Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim Bray wrote: > > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt > > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to. > There are other bits of RSS2 that should be seriously considered -- >

RE: The Atom Format end-game (PICS)??

2005-01-08 Thread Bob Wyman
Tim Bray wrote: > 2. We are close to RSS2 feature-compatibility, we either adopt > image & enclosure or make a conscious decision not to. There are other bits of RSS2 that should be seriously considered -- even if they aren't widely used. For instance, the RSS2 element which contains a PI