Re: URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement?

2006-09-28 Thread Henry Story
+1 to make the MUST a SHOULD +1 on app:edited But I think it would be really useful if we could have something that allowed the user to specify how the feed should be sorted. Henry On 27 Sep 2006, at 22:14, Tim Bray wrote: Please see the dialogue below. (Eric's point seems plausible t

Re: URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement?

2006-09-27 Thread John Panzer
+1 to removing the MUST. +0 to changing it to SHOULD. Tim Bray wrote: Please see the dialogue below. (Eric's point seems plausible to me; personally I'd be inclined to a +1.) Can we have some feedback from the WG ASAP? We want to take protocol-11 to the IETF. -Tim On Sep 26,

URGENT: Remove atom:updated ordering requirement?

2006-09-27 Thread Tim Bray
Please see the dialogue below. (Eric's point seems plausible to me; personally I'd be inclined to a +1.) Can we have some feedback from the WG ASAP? We want to take protocol-11 to the IETF. -Tim On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Eric Scheid wrote: On 27/9/06 8:15 AM, "Tim Bray" <[E