Julian Reschke wrote:
Update -06: I'm still confused by the text. For instance:
- is it intentional that 4.1.3.3 says ``If the value of "type" ends with "+xml" or "/xml"'', while 4.1.3.2 used ``If the value of type begins with "text/" or ends with "+xml"''?
Yes. In 4.1.3.3, you're supposed to apply them in order. Is that what you find confusing?
- also, if content for +xml SHOULD be local (4.1.3.2), why does 4.1.3.3. point 4, make statements about situations where it comes with @src attribute?
I don't know. We should be able to strike them, right?
Maybe it's not a SHOULD requirement after all?
In particular, that's a should against text/plain and text/html in @src.
Robert Sayre
