+1
It may be a good idea to change the descriptive text about the
examples; e.g.,
"A brief, single-entry Atom Feed Document" -> "A single-entry Atom
Feed Document that conforms to all MUST-level requirements"
"A more extensive, single-entry Atom Feed Document" -> "A single-
entry Atom F
I truly believe that this request is completely editorial.
I would like to request that an attempt be made to ensure that the
second "more extensive" example in section 1.1 comply with all SHOULDs.
In particular, the feed SHOULD contain a link with a rel='self'.
If I find other deviations f
