Re: summary of editors' action items ...so far

2005-04-06 Thread Mark Nottingham
I can do that later tonight. On Apr 6, 2005, at 5:37 PM, Tim Bray wrote: On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Robert Sayre wrote: Anything to add? No, I think Rob's got it. Sooner is better. Who's going to take care of submitting the MIME type registration? A volunteer would be welcome. -Tim Julian

Re: summary of editors' action items ...so far

2005-04-06 Thread Robert Sayre
Tim Bray wrote: On Apr 5, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Robert Sayre wrote: Anything to add? No, I think Rob's got it. Sooner is better. Who's going to take care of submitting the MIME type registration? A volunteer would be welcome. I'm unable to discern any consensus around the cardinality constraints

summary of editors' action items ...so far

2005-04-05 Thread Robert Sayre
Anything to add? Julian Reschke wrote: 05-C05, 4.15.3 processing model Update -06: I'm still confused by the text. For instance... I agree that this section is gnarly. The editors will attempt to clarify that section without making any normative changes, and will check with the WG to verify that