html content, xml:base and xml:lang

2006-11-02 Thread Henry Story
Does xml:base and xml:lang apply to html encoded content? There is the notion of language sensitivity and content is language sensitive. So it makes sense to apply it to html content. But what about the xml:base? Henry

Re: html content, xml:base and xml:lang

2006-11-02 Thread A. Pagaltzis
Does xml:base and xml:lang apply to html encoded content? Yes, definitely. -- GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - Überall, wo DSL verfügbar ist! NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

Re: html content, xml:base and xml:lang

2006-11-02 Thread James M Snell
+1 A. Pagaltzis wrote: Does xml:base and xml:lang apply to html encoded content? Yes, definitely.

Re: xml:base and xml:lang

2005-03-16 Thread Tim Bray
attribute. Is this obvious or do we need to make it clear that the statements above do not override the rules of XHTML? Or maybe what we're really saying is that any *Atom* element may have an xml:base/xml:lang? -Tim

Re: xml:base and xml:lang

2005-03-16 Thread David Powell
attribute; and no XHTML elements can legally carry an xml:base attribute. Is this obvious or do we need to make it clear that the statements above do not override the rules of XHTML? Or maybe what we're really saying is that any *Atom* element may have an xml:base/xml:lang? -Tim Yes

Re: xml:base and xml:lang

2005-03-16 Thread Joe Gregorio
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:25:29 -0800, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or maybe what we're really saying is that any *Atom* element may have an xml:base/xml:lang? -Tim +1 That's how I initially read it, but I see how the current wording could be read to allow xml:base/xml:lang on any element