report back <-- yes please
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Aaron Weitekamp wrote:
> This is a common use case that we need to demonstrate. If possible, please
> report back here with the approach.
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Brent Baude wrote:
>
>> Justin,
>>
>> Contact me on internal
On 11/08/2016 04:17 PM, Stephen Milner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>> system container. I guess we could add a label like
>>
>> LABEL org.projectatomic.atomic.type=system
>>
>> Then this would cause atomic to use the --system flag?
>>
>> Thoughts on this la
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> system container. I guess we could add a label like
>
> LABEL org.projectatomic.atomic.type=system
>
> Then this would cause atomic to use the --system flag?
>
> Thoughts on this label?
Makes sense. My only question would be if it should b
On 11/08/2016 03:35 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>> LABEL org.projectatomic.atomic.type=system
> Seems OK, though we could also just auto-infer it from the presence
> of /exports/service.template in the image.
I guess we could look for that,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> LABEL org.projectatomic.atomic.type=system
Seems OK, though we could also just auto-infer it from the presence
of /exports/service.template in the image.
Also, I'd vote to deprecate `atomic install` and port users
to either package layeri
Giuseppe Scrivano has been introducing the concept os system containers.
https://github.com/giuseppe/atomic-oci-containers
These are containers pulled to a host using the skopeo via the atomic
install command.
They get installed onto an ostree on /var/lib/containers/atomic.
They install syste
