bubblewrap moved: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap
rpm-ostree moved: https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree
Of the things remaining...probably the biggest is our docker branch:
https://github.com/projectatomic/docker
I feel like it'd be cleanest if we created a new org for this stuff...queu
On Sat, May 4, 2019, at 7:27 PM, Angelos Ching wrote:
> Dear Fellow Dev / Users,
>
> I'm trying to figure out whether running libvirtd+qemu-kvm on Atomic
> server make sense.
>
> One of my CentOS 7 box (my homelab VM host) had been through
> interrupted OS update twice and it required my int
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Doug Campbell wrote:
> Currently running Fedora Atomic 27.153
>
> Following instructions at:
> http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2018/10/fedora-atomic-28-to-29-upgrade/ to
> upgrade to version 29.
>
> Upon reboot everything is fine until I see:
>
> (1 of 2)
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> Right you can get CRI-O and OKD installed on atomic host as layered
> packages. But it will not be updated via the atomic upgrades.
Hmm? rpm-ostree updates layered packages too. It's a true hybrid
image/package system.
Now...there
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, at 2:31 PM, mabi wrote:
> Ah ok so standard CentOS would do it... I guess I missed the point, I
> thought Atomic Host is THE distribution to go with when using such
> platforms like okd.io/OpenShift...
An interesting topic here is whether saying "Fedora/CentOS/RHEL" mean
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, at 12:02 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> rpm-ostree uninstall for all of my packages, but there must be a
> 'blow them all away' command, yes?
rpm-ostree uninstall --all
It's in --help but not the man page because...those get out of sync =/
See also https://github.com/proj
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, at 11:12 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> Hi Colin
>
> Thanks very much for your comments.
>
> (I have had some success - see my email which was sent 3 mins before
> yours..)
>
> I tried accessing your bugzilla.redhat link, but got:
>
> You are not authorized to access
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> My particular piece of bare metal seems to have enough memory, disk
> space, Intel x86_64 architecture w/4 cores, ethernet nics, but it does
> not have any video support.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057271
and https:/
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018, at 8:30 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> # systemctl edit docker.service
> [Service]
> Execstart=
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/dockerd --selinux-enabled
> # systemctl restart docker
> # docker run fedora cat /proc/self/attr/current
> system_u:system_r:container_t:s0:c81,c142#
See:
/
I'm looking at general things in how CoreOS Container Linux does
things vs Fedora Atomic - specifically I think we should have a file like:
https://alpha.release.core-os.net/amd64-usr/current/coreos_production_ami_all.json
While I was doing this, one thing I noticed is that CL is gp2 only:
https:/
Hi Shane,
On Mon, May 21, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Shane O'Donnell wrote:
> Hey All –
>
> We’re building an IoT edge device based on CentOS Atomic Host
Cool; without knowing more it feels like this falls in between "server"
and "device"? If it's more "device" like then the newly formed Fedora
IoT gr
On Thu, May 17, 2018, at 8:24 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf I have
>
> fastestmirror=1
> max_parallel_downloads=20
>
> what is the of that in rpm-ostree?
So...this is an interesting topic. As the name implies, rpm-ostree
glues together two fundamentally different "
On Wed, May 16, 2018, at 12:38 AM, Damian Ivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to test Fedora Atomic Workstation and make custom images
> of it (like I used to with livecd-tools). There are guides for
> building VM images, what would be needed to convert them into *iso
> images that can be wr
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2018, at 7:44 PM, Rares Vernica wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed the latest CentOS image on bare metal. Docker seems to work
> fine, but I get an error message at start-up about the docker-storage-setup
> service failing to start. I am happy with the current Docker storage setup,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> This version no longer requires the Buildah package to be installed but
> can still do podman builds. It is 36 Mb in size and I believe should
> now be considered for inclusion into the atomic host by default as a
> container runtime.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 3:38 PM, Clement Verna wrote:
> So if you maintain a container could you please build your container
> against the f28 and master branch.
There's a fairly important deeper question here: Do we really
want to build all of these containers against each fedora release?
Do
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, at 12:34 PM, Chris Negus wrote:
> In my mind, this means that someone trying out vanilla Kubernetes will
> start with some OS outside of the Fedora/RHEL/CentOS ecosystem. My
> question is, is it okay to let this content die? Or should we encourage
> some way to still manua
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 02/16/2018 11:23 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In working on our CI (and just locally in containers in general), I
> > find https://github.com/stefwalter/oci-kvm-hook to be very, very
> > usefu
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> Does this actually work?
Yes =) For example it broke and we fixed it e.g.:
https://github.com/stefwalter/oci-kvm-hook/pull/4
> I would figure the device cgroup would prevent
> use of the kvm device inside a container unless you also mod
Hi,
In working on our CI (and just locally in containers in general), I
find https://github.com/stefwalter/oci-kvm-hook to be very, very
useful. Yes, there are other ways one can do it; see the thread in
https://github.com/stefwalter/oci-kvm-hook/issues/5
I propose moving it into our organizatio
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > Oh, great! for some reason I assumed rpm-ostree can only download
> > pre-composed trees from Fedora.
Right, rpm-ostree is a fully hybrid system, it links to libdnf *and* libostree
and combines
functionality from both. See:
https://fedorap
tation
---
Matthew Micene, Giuseppe Scrivano: Moving to Atomic System Containers
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ImTdrKv_Q0
Sanja Bonic and Colin Walters: You want a Clean Desktop OS? Containerize it.
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4IPWlfkJSo
Slides:
https://fedora
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018, at 5:01 AM, Sanja Bonic wrote:
> This meeting will not happen unless someone else wants to hold it - I am in
> flight at that time coming back from FOSDEM.
No worries, I think one of us can do it! Since there's a lot going on I'd say
let's hold it anyways.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Chris Negus wrote:
> I'm working on a procedure for installing RHEL Atomic on Azure. As part
> of that, I want to install the WALinuxAgent RPM package, which is in the
> rhel-7-server-extras-rpms repository. That repository is not enabled by
> default. What I
I just want to highlight some "in flight" work on reducing the
on-disk footprint of Atomic Host (and also Fedora userspace
in general to some degree).
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl/pull-request/1
^ in rawhide, may try to nag maintainer to backport to f27
This one isn't *large* per se
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018, at 3:48 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> ostree 2017.13-3.fc27.x86_64 -> 2017.15-1.fc27.x86_64
Notably this has
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ostree/c/7198ec08c451ff394024709ad2f7d3df01ae5329?branch=master
related to:
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/405
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, at 01:11 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Basically, we're reviving an old idea for the modern age of images; I'm
> calling
> it "rpm-ostree jigdo ♲📦" (emoji are for "recycle package"):
>
> https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree
I've been working on Project Atomic for several years now; first post:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2014-April/msg0.html
(And the rpm-ostree/ostree projects predate that; rpm-ostree's "gitbirthday" is
coming up at Sat Dec 21 19:41:30 2013 -0500)
This en
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017, at 03:53 PM, Iván Chavero wrote:
>
> The Cubie is Cortex-A7 (ARMv7-A) 32bits.
We don't currently have any media for this; Fedora Atomic Host
is currently more targeted for non-embedded servers. That said
I know it's been done in the past - anywhere the general Fedora
package
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-11-15/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-11-15-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-11-15/fedora_atomic_wg.2017-11-15-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-11-15/fed
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017, at 07:00 PM, William Brown wrote:
>
> 1) opensc should be part of the base image as it enables freeipa
> smartcard authentication and other related parts to work correctly (I'm
> layering it in for now
Me too, in my case for yubikey. That said my opinion here is that we
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 02:29 PM, Stephen Milner wrote:
> What about literally providing dkms in a container? It wouldn't
> directly take care of the original request but it would give an avenue
> for folks to use the dkms toolchain if they'd like to in AH without
> package layering.
Maybe? Ar
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 01:58 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> oreos-nvidia approach
> is basically "dkms in a container"
Nope, I looked at this more and I'm wrong - it's building
a container matching each CoreOS release in Travis and
pushing that. So if that build somehow
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Stephen Milner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> > Really you have two options.
> >
> > 1. unlock your ostree and install the rpms
> > 2. build the kernel module for the kernel you are targeting and deliver via
> > a system
> >
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 12:36 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 11/08/2017 12:06 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> >>
> >> - ostree admin unlock --hotfix
> >> - alias yum='/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> - ostree admin unlock --hotfix
> - alias yum='/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py'
Let's please not mention `--hotfix`? The reason this
breaks is I'm pretty sure DKMS would need a lot of
work to properly interact with the underlying ostree
"snaps
Hi Matt,
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, at 08:50 PM, Matt Jansen wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to use iPXE to boot into a live atomic host.
Basically at the moment we've put work on "live/diskless" AH on hold
because it kind of conflicts with management tools (e.g. Ansible no
longer works persistently), a
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, at 03:57 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
> The goal is to build the images automatically on every PR merged.
> Occasional builds (maybe daily?) will prevent to miss changes in the
> base layers or in the installed rpms.
Let's write down these requirements/requests in an issue
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017, at 10:16 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> Atomic workstation is included in the normal fedora release process
> and is part of RC 1.7:
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/27/Fedora-27-20171101.0/compose/WorkstationOstree/x86_64/iso/Fedora-WorkstationOstree-ostree-x86_64
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017, at 10:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/27/Fedora-27-20171101.0/compose/Docker/aarch64/images/Fedora-Docker-Base-27-1.2.aarch64.tar.xz
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/27/Fedora-27-20171101.0/compose/Docker/armhfp/images/Fedora-D
Hey, so we had a docs hackfest at Flock, which was great.
I was very inspired. Honestly I am terrible about writing
docs, and there's many days I feel like we'd be in a lot
better place if we were better about this.
So the result of the hackfest was:
https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-host-d
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, at 02:51 PM, Ryan Barry wrote:
>
> I'd imagine the same. That said, oVirt Node is also not managed by
> yum, and the specific request there was still to have separate
> filesystems. The theory being that a runaway process or attacker
> which/who fills one of the partitions can
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017, at 09:52 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> If there is ever a case where people "need" to `ostree admin unlock --hotfix`
> and install a new patched rpm that hasn't been released yet, should we
> consider
> including microdnf to make it easier to grab those rpms?
In general, rpm-os
Hi Ryan, thanks for bringing this up!
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017, at 03:31 PM, Ryan Barry wrote:
>
> /home
> /opt
> /var
> /var/log
> /var/log/audit
As I understand it, the NIST-800 specification was designed for a "traditional"
system managed via yum. I imagine they did a default RHEL7 install and
l
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017, at 10:23 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/21/2017 04:17 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Dusty,
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-26-20170821.0/compose/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-ostree-x86_64-26-20170821.0.iso
> >
> > Passed the minnowb
Hey, so previously we tended to discuss Atomic Host content
changes on this list, but since then the
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/
tracker was created and has been used more.
See https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/315
for tuned.
See this PR for why the PR to add microcode_ctl was pushed:
https://pag
There was a discussion today in the Atomic WG about using Modules.
Meeting log:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-August/msg4.html
Agenda discussion:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2017-August/msg2.html
(Side note;
Hey, just a quick note here that I've been waging a fight to keep
/usr/bin/python as Python 2 for Fedora Atomic Host, and in
general to support Ansible.
This was covered on LWN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/729366/
For openshift-ansible I think we're generally OK with supporting
Python 3 and working
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017, at 10:50 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> ostree 2017.7-2.fc26.x86_64 -> 2017.8-3.fc26.x86_64
> ostree-grub2 2017.7-2.fc26.x86_64 -> 2017.8-3.fc26.x86_64
> ostree-libs 2017.7-2.fc26.x86_64 -> 2017.8-3.fc26.x86_64
This also switches ostree to libcurl (which is why libsoup dropp
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017, at 12:28 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> We will try to release blogs and documentation over the next few weeks
> to show you new features and guide how to upgrade your existing hosts.
We have this wiki page for the latter, I've updated it now:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atomic
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I propose moving:
> https://github.com/cgwalters/projectatomic-ci-infra
> into our org, and renaming it to paci. This follows on from the
> move of PAPR (formerly redhat-ci) into the org.
>
>
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017, at 07:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Saw this today. I was on the serial console so kernel messages were coming to
> the console.
> Not sure if it is an issue or can safely be ignored.
>
> [root@localhost ~]# rpm-ostree status
> [ 23.266519] gpg2 (1095) used greatest stack
Hey,
I propose moving:
https://github.com/cgwalters/projectatomic-ci-infra
into our org, and renaming it to paci. This follows on from the
move of PAPR (formerly redhat-ci) into the org.
See: https://github.com/projectatomic/papr/issues/29#issuecomment-304020880
The main content of this reposit
do this in a different commit with a
> commit message that is relevant?
I updated the existing commit message, I think the "match Fedora Server"
rationale should cover it, right?
From 430a8722acd55c93d8794e93c54c992e2c8a7ee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Walters
Date: Mon, 5
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:58 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> One qualification - we use overlay2 by default, but we are going to be
> placing all of /var/lib/docker/ on its own filesystem:
>
> $ cat /etc/sysconfig/docker-storage-setup
> # Edit this file to override any configuration options s
le)
So let's do the same thing here as for the QCOW2/AMI, except keep
the 40GB number?
From ccbe400f0340eda93b7d8f3c052c355dea17aebc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Walters
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:46:40 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Match Fedora Server's partitioning
The max size of
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> oc cluster up will likely continue to use docker for the near future.
That makes sense to me - and for that matter from my perspective
AH is going to include docker for the near future. But my original goal
was to talk about the not-near
I've seen some interesting work on CRI-O for Kube/OpenShift. But
I'm wondering about what people are thinking the future of
docker.service and /usr/bin/docker is (particularly for Atomic Host).
The particular intersection with AH is handling container storage;
AIUI right now you can't have CRI-O
On Wed, May 10, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Antonio Murdaca wrote:
> I've started working on the integration between Openshift Origin and
> CRI-O some time ago with nice initial results.
Nice work!
> For anyone who wants to step in and try out Openshift Origin and CRI-O, I've
> created some scripts to se
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017, at 01:31 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 04/26/2017 01:12 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> >> I traced it down to:
> >>
> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> I traced it down to:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/atomic.git/commit/?h=f25&id=7d15e4a0be2db29deda4b92a039a041d81bbe205
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/atomic.git/commit/?h=f25&id=cb845639e7388bb9aa3b5aef7dabffa34
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> Difference between 25.113 from fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/updates/docker-host
> and 25.119 from fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/testing/docker-host introduces
> quite a few new deps:
>
> Upgraded:
I suspect one of these...
> binutils-2.26.1-1.fc
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017, at 10:52 AM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> I decided to try out Atomic Workstation as default laptop, and it is
> very interesting.
If anyone wants more info, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AtomicWorkstation
=>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desk...
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017, at 01:56 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> NOTE: please reply-all when responding to this message
>
>
> In Fedora Atomic Host if we use system containers as advertised
> we end up using `atomic pull --storage ostree` which by default
> throws images into /var/lib/containers/atomic/.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017, at 02:18 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> 1. Is there a *reason* we didn't relocate the HTTPD logs to Journald
> when Fedora went Systemd?
It impacts performance:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963620
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> NOTE: if you respond to this message please 'reply-all'.
>
> I'd like to discuss firewalld on atomic host.
I think there here are two cases:
AH-as-Kube/OpenShift host: In this I'd turn the conversation around - do
Kube/OpenShift want to d
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017, at 03:34 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017, at 03:04 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
> > After starting a VM in kubevirt, can access the qemu monitor or have
> > libvirt access to that VM ... from a container in a kubernetes pod?
>
> To rephras
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017, at 03:04 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
> After starting a VM in kubevirt, can access the qemu monitor or have
> libvirt access to that VM ... from a container in a kubernetes pod?
To rephrase what Stef is saying:
First, this is mostly about using VMs for *testing*. Not running
pro
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017, at 07:07 AM, Chen Fan wrote:
> ...
> the logging showing no subject, is it a bug? how can I add any
> statement to this commit?
See:
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/162
TL;DR: we actually haven't really plumbed through a story on
making commit
mes
Hey,
Does anyone know what the status of
https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-system-containers
is in general, and in particular I'm interested in the
"containerized docker" approach.
Can someone who knows a bit more about this add
e.g. a `README.md` with getting started instructions?
I did f
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017, at 06:56 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Buildah project (https://github.com/nalind/buildah) would like to
> move under projectatomic.
Now that we have some CI services maintained by people in this org,
part of this template should be:
- Do you want to use https://
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> We are going to attempt to release the 20170314 images.
> These images contain the following ostree version/commit:
>
> 25.80
> 24d4499420ffb2cc49681020bbe5aa6780d780d2b811eab1f5ffea6446b5a4c5
This commit passed the atomic-host-tests at l
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 08:32 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> Doesn't work in Kubernetes today.
Is there a kube issue for exposing it? I can't find it if so.
For reference this came from:
https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/26061
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 01:37 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> The atomic images are here:
^ Host =)
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-25-20170228.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/
Autocloud:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/857
Lo
The CentOS Atomic Host "Devel" branch, or "CAHC" is
a development stream on top of the CentOS Core. More information is available
at https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel
This is a new release of the "alpha" branch which is a good place
to try out newer versions of the atomic/
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, at 05:32 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> The vm images are here:
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-25-20170124.1/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/
As a reminder, Atomic Host uses rpm-ostree (which uses ostree) for updates,
and in the future[1] ho
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017, at 07:22 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Also, performance is MUCH better on PostgreSQL pgbench than devicemapper
> is. Like 3X better.
You really should not store databases (or any persistent data)
in the container's rootfs. Use kubernetes PVs, etc., or for
a real pet database, a
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
> Are the POSIX issues in applications running on overlay mostly
> resolved now? I.e. if we flipped the default would be reasonably able
> to support a diverse range of Linux workloads without the risk that
> previously existed?
overlayf
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016, at 07:25 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> 2016-12-09 0:18 GMT+03:00 Josh Berkus :
> > Vasiliy,
> >
> > You can follow the UEFI bug here:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185
There's a patch available for this now.
> Thanks, also i have problem on uefi system with my la
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 04:14 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> docker run -ti -v /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro fedora bash
One problem with this (and in general, any host <-> container binds)
is that one needs to consider format versioning.
Right now glibc is on its second version of the timezon
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> I found hack in pagure.io, and in post process script remove protected
> tmp and protected home. After that all works fine.
Yeah, we'll carry the hack until systemd upgrades. For
reference, this is:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/is
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016, at 02:56 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> Does it possible to recheck tree against remote, for example i have
> local storage that can lost data (ssd/flash/hdd) and want to compare
> local objects with remotes (via fingerprint, hash or something like
> this).
> Does it possible
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Yun-Chih Chen wrote:
> I use the Vagrantfile[1] in rpm-ostree to boot up a CentOS 7
> Atomic Host.
> The kernel panics when running "rpm-ostree install fuse-sshfs", in the
> stage of "Copying /etc changes: xx modified, xx removed, xx added".
> It turns out that a
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 08:27 PM, Mark Dyer wrote:
> I'm trying to justify moving our CentOS 6.6 based product to
> Atomic Host.
>
> It looks like Atomic Host on CentOS is currently still in 'alpha'.
There are two CentOS streams:
- Core: A rebuild of "upstream" EL7 Atomic Host, just l
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> LABEL org.projectatomic.atomic.type=system
Seems OK, though we could also just auto-infer it from the presence
of /exports/service.template in the image.
Also, I'd vote to deprecate `atomic install` and port users
to either package layeri
See this downstream bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186757
What I'm arguing here essentially is that building on
the previous change of
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2016-August/msg00054.html
Atomic Host should now be thought of more as
a *gen
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Jason DeTiberus wrote:
> The other issue is that we don't require users to manage their
> environments with Ansible, so our temporary modifications would
> also need to be documented and implemented separately for non-
> Ansible users.
I see the point, but the tu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 02:37 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> If we block the creation of the devices when exploding a OCI Image
> Bundle, we end up with something that is different then what is
> downloaded and this could potentially cause problems with mtree checking
> of the image on disk versus t
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> A new release of bubblewrap is available:
>
> https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/releases/tag/v0.1.3
...
> So, expect updates to land in:
>
> - EPEL7
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/bubb
A new release of bubblewrap is available:
https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/releases/tag/v0.1.3
Which fixes a local privilege escalation. Specifically relevant to Project
Atomic,
this applies only to CentOS7/RHEL7 systems which have
bubblewrap installed as privileged code.
Notably, w
Hey, so we've talked about this a lot, and there
are now two change pages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WorkstationOstree
This is in Fedora release engineering, and the scope is basically
rpm-ostree + flatpak
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/AtomicWorkstation
But I'd lik
Hi,
I've tagged a new CentOS Atomic Host Alpha, see:
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel
There's a lot happening in the atomic/skopeo components, and this continues
to track the latest there, as well as newer ostree/rpm-ostree, which have
a few fixes for package layering.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 02:45 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> Because layered products (not just OpenShift) do not want to be
> coupled to the RHEL release schedule to update their profiles. They
> want to own their profiles and rely on the tuned daemon to be there.
I see two aspects to this discussio
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383708
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnutls-3.5.5-2.fc25
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, at 01:36 PM, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> Going fwd, I think we would rather not maintain two locations (atomic-
> * and atomic-openshift-* tuned profiles with identical content.
Yes, agreed.
>
> So, trying to reason a way to get those profiles onto an AH since we
> can't install t
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016, at 04:36 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree upgrade
> Updating from: fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host
> error: Bus owner changed, aborting.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383708
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 05:44 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> I need to do some things - for example, but not full:
>
> * mask/disable some services
> * modify journald.conf
> * write sysctl.conf
> * create some udev rules
>
> I don't need to run this again and again in all ostree running servers
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016, at 02:27 PM, Tom McKay wrote:
> I'm trying to wrap my head around ostree/rpm-ostree/atomic to think
> about how Satellite-6 (and upstream katello) can contribute to the
> flow. A couple questions...
> First, I see rpm-ostree-toolkit referenced in a lot of places but am
> strug
Hi,
I don't announce every release of rpm-ostree, but this one is notable
because the package layering is now marked as stable, and is now
known as `rpm-ostree install` or `atomic host install`. A bit
more info in the tag:
https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/releases/tag/v2016.8
(With a
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016, at 06:56 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> I have ostree system with /boot and / lv
> Now my users home lives on lv /
> I create new lv with name home and want to use it to store /home.
> Can somebody provide me description what target path i need to use to
> move users dir, so it
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
