On 09/01/2016 12:23 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 08/27/2016 06:18 AM, SGhosh wrote:
The current state of Kube however is not arch aware afaik - although we
could manage that via node labels, it would be clunky. So short term,
arch specific clusters. But the goal should be arch-aware orchestrators
On 08/26/2016 06:13 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 08/26/2016 11:24 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
Will kube schedule a container on a host that can't run it? i.e. a
container with x86 code on a AArch64 host, or vice versa? I think that
it needs to DTRT sooner rather than later if the scheduling isn't
smart
On 08/09/2016 07:46 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
Hi! I check some kickstart files and see, that by default atomic uses
xfs for root fs.
Where i can find some info why it used (and not ext4...) ?
XFS is the default for RHEL. We started building Atomic Host from RHEL
and carried its default.
On 04/14/2016 05:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-extras/pull/1902
See link. I thought there might be some interested parties on this list :)
You think? :)
Thanks!
subhendu
On 04/13/2016 05:50 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
- is there any roadmap or clear priorities, planed deadlines etc?
With respect to the RH product roadmap - we do have a public view of the
roadmap of what we are planning from a RH product release perspective.
https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/rele
On 04/07/2016 12:01 PM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
Related to this whole topic, there's a lot of potential stuff in this
area. One thing that might also be good for example is to extract
recent critical log messages from the systemd jour
On 03/28/2016 10:16 AM, Jason DeTiberus wrote:
Does it make sense to configure it through alternatives?
alternative changes the target via symlinks in /usr/bin - this is a
readonly FS for rpm-ostree based builds.
For normal RPM installs, alternatives is an option.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9
On 03/22/2016 06:23 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Atomic Legion,
So we want to have a presence on Slack in order to reach users and
developers who don't do IRC or email so much. However, this only makes
sense if several of us are willing to log into the channel every day.
Who's up for it? Note that
There are a couple of k8s PRs on node evacuation
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/6080
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/3885
So either OpenShift evacuation, or K8s evacution could free up the node,
and the daemon mode that Colin mentioned could be leveraged by an
e
On 05/21/2015 05:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015, at 04:22 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
Every reboot it's ignored.
Only on an explicit deamon-reload did it take the unit file into account.
One side effect of how `atomic host upgrade` works via OSTree is that
the configuration merge
#PermitRootLogin yes
?
On 05/21/2015 05:21 PM, James wrote:
I'm having trouble SSH-ing to root on an atomic host. To make it easy
to debug, I can replicate the issue *from* the host.
boot up atomic host. I'm using Fedora 21
$ cat foo
Host localhost
HostName localhost
User vagrant
Port
On 05/15/2015 12:34 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
Folks -
When comparing base images:
centos 232M
fedora 254M
ubuntu 208M
debian:wheezy 97M
Do we have any plans for OS-light images?
--
Cheers,
Timothy St. Clair
Red Hat Inc.
You mean the bootable OS image?
12 matches
Mail list logo
